Izik Eidus wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 23:21 +0800, Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
>> Currently, KVM_SET_MEMORY_REGION ioctl is put under arch, but its
>> implementation is in common code . From code logic, it seems very
>> strange. Maybe I missed some threads about its discuss, who can
>> tell me the s
Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
> Currently, KVM_SET_MEMORY_REGION ioctl is put under arch, but its
> implementation is in common code . From code logic, it seems very
> strange. Maybe I missed some threads about its discuss, who can tell me
> the story ? Thanks a lot! :)
>
KVM_SET_MEMORY_REGION is obso
On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 23:21 +0800, Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
> Currently, KVM_SET_MEMORY_REGION ioctl is put under arch, but its
> implementation is in common code . From code logic, it seems very
> strange. Maybe I missed some threads about its discuss, who can tell me
> the story ? Thanks a lot! :)