Re: [kvm-devel] RFC/Patch 0/4 portability split

2007-10-29 Thread Avi Kivity
Carsten Otte wrote: > This patch series continues the split of kvm_main.c for portability. The > first patch that splits kvm_vm_ioctl is unchanged since last submit, but > has not yet been picked up upstream. There are no more ongoing > discussions regarding it's content, therefore I'd like to ask

Re: [kvm-devel] RFC/Patch 0/4 portability split

2007-10-29 Thread Zhang, Xiantao
Carsten Otte wrote: > This patch series continues the split of kvm_main.c for portability. > The first patch that splits kvm_vm_ioctl is unchanged since last > submit, but has not yet been picked up upstream. There are no more > ongoing discussions regarding it's content, therefore I'd like to ask

Re: [kvm-devel] RFC/Patch 0/4 portability split

2007-10-29 Thread Hollis Blanchard
On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 16:08 +0100, Carsten Otte wrote: > This patch series continues the split of kvm_main.c for portability. The > first patch that splits kvm_vm_ioctl is unchanged since last submit, but > has not yet been picked up upstream. There are no more ongoing > discussions regarding it's