Karl Rister wrote:
> On Thursday 01 May 2008 7:16:53 pm Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
>> Does -no-kvm-irqchip or -no-kvm-pit makes a difference? If not, please
>> grab kvm_stat --once output when that happens.
>>
>
> Per some suggestions I have moved up to kvm-68 which is better, but still
> ha
Hi Karl,
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 08:40:22PM -0500, Karl Rister wrote:
> On Thursday 01 May 2008 7:16:53 pm Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > Does -no-kvm-irqchip or -no-kvm-pit makes a difference? If not, please
> > grab kvm_stat --once output when that happens.
>
> Per some suggestions I have moved up
On Thursday 01 May 2008 7:16:53 pm Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> Does -no-kvm-irqchip or -no-kvm-pit makes a difference? If not, please
> grab kvm_stat --once output when that happens.
Per some suggestions I have moved up to kvm-68 which is better, but still
having problems. Replicating the problem w
Karl Rister wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have been trying to do some testing of a large number of guests (72) on a
> big multi-node IBM box (8 sockets, 32 cores, 128GB) and I am having various
> issues with the guests. I can get the guests to boot, but then I start to
> have problems. Some guests appear
On Thursday 01 May 2008 7:16:53 pm Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 06:00:44PM -0500, Karl Rister wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I have been trying to do some testing of a large number of guests (72) on
> > a big multi-node IBM box (8 sockets, 32 cores, 128GB) and I am having
> > various iss
On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 06:00:44PM -0500, Karl Rister wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have been trying to do some testing of a large number of guests (72) on a
> big multi-node IBM box (8 sockets, 32 cores, 128GB) and I am having various
> issues with the guests. I can get the guests to boot, but then I star
