Jeremy Katz wrote:
> Avi Kivity wrote:
>> Jeremy Katz wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2007-01-31 at 12:32 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
Jeremy Katz wrote:
> Avi Kivity wrote:
>> I've committed kvm support for host suspend-to-disk (and
>> hopefully resume too). This means you can suspend your mach
Joerg Roedel wrote:
> From: Markus Rechberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> From: Joerg Roedel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> This patch fixes the initialization of the segment registers which
> solves the triple fault and keyboard controller reset problems in
> kvm/qemu guests as well as the slow grub menu inter
Avi Kivity schrieb:
> Joerg Roedel wrote:
>> From: Markus Rechberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> From: Joerg Roedel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> This patch fixes the initialization of the segment registers which
>> solves the triple fault and keyboard controller reset problems in
>> kvm/qemu guests as well
Daniel Hecken wrote:
> I tried this patch yesterday whilst installing Windows 2003 with kvm svn
> and when the installer requested a reboot I just got this in the console:
>
> unhandled vm exit: 0x8021
> rax rbx rcx rdx
> 0600
> r
Hi All,
New to the list and project...hoping to make a meaningful contribution here
someday :)
I am in the process of coming up to speed on the KVM project (very cool BTW).
I found that it was extremely simple to get setup and running. During the
course of setting it up, I found an issue r
Gregory Haskins wrote:
> Hi All,
> New to the list and project...hoping to make a meaningful contribution here
> someday :)
>
> I am in the process of coming up to speed on the KVM project (very cool BTW).
> I found that it was extremely simple to get setup and running. During the
> course o
>>> On Thu, Feb 1, 2007 at 7:46 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gregory Haskins wrote:
>
>> 1) Is this how illegal- op would be handled, or would that stay entirely in
> the domain of the guest?
>>
>
> An illegal opcode in the guest is handled no
Hi Avi,
You might want to consider setting the reply-to on kvm-commits to
kvm-devel.
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 02:29:04PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Modified: kvm/trunk/kernel/vmx.c
> ==
> --- kvm/trunk/kernel/vmx.c(or
Gregory Haskins wrote:
On Thu, Feb 1, 2007 at 7:46 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Gregory Haskins wrote:
>>
>>
>>> 1) Is this how illegal- op would be handled, or would that stay entirely in
>>>
>> the domain of
Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> Hi Avi,
>
> You might want to consider setting the reply-to on kvm-commits to
> kvm-devel.
>
>
At qumranet we're used to reply-to-committer, so...
> On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 02:29:04PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>
>> Modified: kvm/trunk/kernel/vmx.c
>> =
Small cleanup: we check (pdpte & 1) && (pdpte & constant). Instead
just check (pdpte & (constant | 1)).
Signed-off-by: Muli Ben-Yehuda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: kernel/kvm_main.c
===
--- kernel/kvm_main.c (revision 4379)
+++ kerne
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 03:08:17PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >I noticed that the svm 'vmcall_interception' doesn't set
> >kvm_run->exit_reason - is the setting here superflous or needed? and
> >if it's needed, is it also needed in svm?
> >
>
> A 'return 1' means there won't be an exit to user
Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> Small cleanup: we check (pdpte & 1) && (pdpte & constant). Instead
> just check (pdpte & (constant | 1)).
>
> Signed-off-by: Muli Ben-Yehuda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Index: kernel/kvm_main.c
> ===
> --- kernel/k
Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> Thanks for the explanation. I notice it's already gone in the trunk so
> no cleanup patch :_)
>
>
kvm trunk is a dangerous place :)
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
---
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 04:07:01PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> >Small cleanup: we check (pdpte & 1) && (pdpte & constant). Instead
> >just check (pdpte & (constant | 1)).
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Muli Ben-Yehuda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >Index: kernel/kvm_main.c
> >===
Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 04:07:01PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
>>
>>> Small cleanup: we check (pdpte & 1) && (pdpte & constant). Instead
>>> just check (pdpte & (constant | 1)).
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Muli Ben-Yehuda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:kvm-devel-
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Muli Ben-Yehuda
>Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 4:46 PM
>To: Avi Kivity
>Cc: kvm-devel
>Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] simplify pdpte check
>
>On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 04:07:01PM +0200, Avi
Dor Laor wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:kvm-devel-
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Muli Ben-Yehuda
>> Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 4:46 PM
>> To: Avi Kivity
>> Cc: kvm-devel
>> Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] simplify pdpte check
>>
>> On Thu, F
Avi Kivity wrote:
>>
>> What about 'if (pdpte & 0xfff001e7ull > 0x1)' ?
>>
>
> That would work.
Actually it doesn't. pdpte == 2 fails.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
-
Using Tomc
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 04:52:18PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> pdpte == 2 is a legal value. in the original code, the (pdpte & 1)
> == 0 and we don't 'goto out'. In the patched code, (pdpte & 0xblah)
> == 2 and we 'goto out'.
Yup, I got it now. Thanks.
Cheers,
Muli
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 06:52:47AM -0800, Dor Laor wrote:
> What about 'if (pdpte & 0xfff001e7ull > 0x1)' ?
> Although the original is more readable.
The original is better, perhaps with a nice comment :-)
Cheers,
Muli
I wanted to give an update on a project I'm attempting with KVM. The
goal is to implement a software-based lockstepping of two or more
virtual guests. There are a number of applications of this, and the
most related is the ReVirt project that was done with UML and Xen by
Dunlap et al.
The basic id
>I wanted to give an update on a project I'm attempting with KVM. The
>goal is to implement a software-based lockstepping of two or more
>virtual guests. There are a number of applications of this, and the
>most related is the ReVirt project that was done with UML and Xen by
>Dunlap et al.
>
>The b
Casey Jeffery wrote:
> 1. What is the best way to start and ID multiple guests? I've just
> been configuring a script to start up two of them from the
> command-line and storing an ID in the kvm_vcpu structure. The first to
> get to get to vmc_run() is designated as the primary and the other is
> t
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 10:25:21AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Joerg Roedel wrote:
> >From: Markus Rechberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >From: Joerg Roedel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >This patch fixes the initialization of the segment registers which
> >solves the triple fault and keyboard controller res
Thanks for the very quick response. You guys at Qumranet are good. :)
On 2/1/07, Dor Laor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >The main questions I have at the moment are the following:
> >
> >1. What is the best way to start and ID multiple guests? I've just
> >been configuring a script to start up two
On 2/1/07, Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Casey Jeffery wrote:
> > 1. What is the best way to start and ID multiple guests? I've just
> > been configuring a script to start up two of them from the
> > command-line and storing an ID in the kvm_vcpu structure. The first to
> > get to get to
Apologies if you received multiple copies of this message.
===
CALL FOR PAPERS
Workshop on Virtualization/Xen in High-Performance Cluster
and Grid Computing (XHPC'07)
as part of The 16th IEEE International Symposium on High
Performance
Hi,
Did something change recently with the SVN server? I think I'm getting
banned from it. When I try to update my tailor tree, I start getting
time outs and then any SVN command fails with connection closed.
With another IP, trying to sync on the other machine results in the same
thing happ
Anthony,
No DoS software was installed, but we did have some network problems.
I'll look into it.
Rami
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anthony
Liguori
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 10:32 PM
To: kvm-devel
Subject: [kvm-devel] Subversion
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 01:49:06PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> The attached patch should fix it.
Update for those who wouldn't have followed IRC meanwhile: this patch
does fix the bug for Opteron-based systems, but doesn't improve anything
on my X2 4600+. Avi therefore suggests that someone (_joro?
Rami Tamir wrote:
> Anthony,
> No DoS software was installed, but we did have some network problems.
> I'll look into it.
>
Thanks! If it helps, I can reproduce just by running:
$ while true; do svn ls svn://kvm.qumranet.com/; done
It will start dying usually by the third iteration.
Regards
This patch fixes the mutex, page and kzalloc problems with older kernels.
Signed-off-by: Markus Rechberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
Markus Rechberger
Operating System Research Center
AMD Saxony LLC & Co. KG
Index: mmu.c
===
--- mmu.c (
33 matches
Mail list logo
