Rumo,r N.e'w's_:
Onco,l_ogy M'e+d+. I,n c'. (O TC: ONCO ) a C ancer Tre-a*tment S+oluti ons
Grou p is s a.i*d to h,a*v+e
expe rie,nced o v e.r a 1+000% in_.crease in re-ve-nues f,o r t-h.e fi*scal
3,r_d quart_er endi-ng J'u,l'y',
2,0 0+7 c o-mpared w,i_t+h t-h_e pr*ior y-e-a_r whil+e fis,c
If you are a perso
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
On Fri, 2007-09-21 at 16:22 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 21 September 2007, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > Hmm, I guess we could have a PCI driver which claims all VIRTIO vendor
> > devices.
>
> yes, that was the idea.
>
> > Then it can call virtio_find_driver() (?) at the top of its
> >
On Saturday 22 September 2007, Rusty Russell wrote:
> But now each virtio device has two "struct device"s, not one. And
> you've made up a fictional bus to do it.
>
> Yet for PCI systems, it really is a PCI device; exposing a second bus to
> userspace just because we put a layer in our implement
Zhao, Yunfeng wrote:
> 2. Cannot boot smp windows guests
> SMP XP windows guest will hang
>
This is now fixed.
--
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to
panic.
-
This SF.net email i
What guest drivers?
Cc: Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
An August 18 patch from Jan Engelhardt (06bfb7e) added help text for the
virtualization menu.
Unfortunately the text is misleading, as "guest drivers" are usually
interpreted to
mean "dr
Rusty Russell wrote:
>>
>> A side effect of this is that Xen drivers can no longer use virtio.
>>
>
> I'm not so sure.
>
> We were always assuming that Xen could do state management in its virtio
> layer. If this is not true, it implies we need hooks in the virtio
> drivers, and I don't think
Bugs item #1800187, was opened at 2007-09-22 16:05
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=893831&aid=1800187&group_id=180599
Please note that this message will contain a full copy
I must use VMware sometimes for colaboration projects where others are
using VMware. And also a situation where I have a VERY old development
environment perfectly tweaked on Win98. I have to do one of these say
10% of the time.
100% of the time I'd like to use KVM (or Xen). I'd like to not
I'm sure the developers will be more than happy to answer your question, for
which I sadly don't know the answer.
But perhaps I can speculate/think aloud
What would be needed for these instances is for Virtualization software
makers to agree on an EXTERNAL API shared by all the VMs, so that w
Well, there is discussion on VirtualBox about this topic as well, but
no solution.
http://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/317
Ideally Linux needs some mechanism to "share" VMX across different
virtualizers. But it doesn't exists, and not even planned.
--
-Alexey Eremenko "Technologov"
--
时 间:2007年9月22日 深圳
时 间:2007年9月29日 广州
咨 询 电 话： 0755--26,07?52.,652607/5/365
传 真：0755--2/607536,5
邮 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
联系人：曾`*小.姐 凌/小.姐
费用:1000元/人（包括资料费、午餐及上下午茶点等）
参加对象：董事长、总经理、人力资源总监、人事经理、工会及负责劳动关系的专业人事部
━━━
课程背景:
★ 全新《劳动合同法》“重要
On Sat, 2007-09-22 at 14:43 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> What guest drivers?
>
> Cc: Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Yes, agreed.
Rusty.
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by
On Fri, 2007-09-21 at 14:27 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21 2007, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > I shall look through the code and see if I can figure out how to fix it.
> > I'm assuming from your response that there's not some strange reason to
> > preserve current behaviour.
>
> It surely so
14 matches
Mail list logo
