On Fri, 2007-09-21 at 16:42 +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Am Freitag, 21. September 2007 schrieb Herbert Xu:
> > Please don't use LLTX in new drivers. We're trying to get rid
> > of it since it's
> >
> > 1) unnecessary;
> > 2) causes problems with AF_PACKET seeing things twice.
>
> Ok, b
Scott Serr wrote:
> I must use VMware sometimes for colaboration projects where others are
> using VMware. And also a situation where I have a VERY old development
> environment perfectly tweaked on Win98. I have to do one of these say
> 10% of the time.
>
> 100% of the time I'd like to use KV
On Sat, 2007-09-22 at 12:01 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Saturday 22 September 2007, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > But now each virtio device has two "struct device"s, not one. And
> > you've made up a fictional bus to do it.
> >
> > Yet for PCI systems, it really is a PCI device; exposing a seco
Haydn Solomon wrote:
> You guys are quick! Ok, kvm-39 allows me to run my windows xp machine
> now. I just have one question that I'm not sure of.. should reboot be
> working now? I tried rebooting the windows xp and got the following
> output.
>
Windows ACPI reboot is still broken.
--
err
Hi;
With very recent kernels libata throws lots of errors while booting and it
makes booting really really slow, while searching the solution i found
following bug reports [1],[2] and following commit [3].
Following diff against kvm-userspace HEAD solves this issue for kvm. This
chunk of code
S.Çağlar Onur wrote:
> Hi;
>
> With very recent kernels libata throws lots of errors while booting and it
> makes booting really really slow, while searching the solution i found
> following bug reports [1],[2] and following commit [3].
>
> Following diff against kvm-userspace HEAD solves this is
Laurent Vivier wrote:
> To improve readability, move push, writeback, and grp 1a/2/3/4/5/9 emulation
> parts to functions.
>
>
This patchset doesn't apply, and the changes are too big for me to fix.
Please rebase.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
Avi Kivity wrote:
> Laurent Vivier wrote:
>> To improve readability, move push, writeback, and grp 1a/2/3/4/5/9
>> emulation parts to functions.
>>
>>
>
> This patchset doesn't apply, and the changes are too big for me to
> fix. Please rebase.
>
Also, please make sure the patches don't add t
Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 14:43 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> Rusty Russell wrote:
>>
>>> These helper routines supply most of the virtqueue_ops for hypervisors
>>> which want to use a ring for virtio. Unlike the previous lguest
>>> implementation:
>>>
>>> 3) The page nu
Rusty Russell wrote:
On Sat, 2007-09-22 at 12:01 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Saturday 22 September 2007, Rusty Russell wrote:
But now each virtio device has two "struct device"s, not one. And
you've made up a fictional bus to do it.
Yet for PCI systems, it really is a PCI device;
Farkas Levente wrote:
> Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
>> Libvirt needs works to support block and network stats from QEMU/KVM.
>> Virt-top won't fail because this is missing, it just can't display
>> anything in those columns. The work as far as I understand it is fairly
>> simple, but also lower
On Sun, 2007-09-23 at 12:05 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Rusty Russell wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 14:43 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >> 32 bits of page numbers give 44 bits of physical address on x86. That's
> >> 16TB per guest. Admittedly it's smaller on a VAX.
> >
> > I like to feel that I
Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-09-23 at 12:05 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> Rusty Russell wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 14:43 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>>
32 bits of page numbers give 44 bits of physical address on x86. That's
16TB per guest. Admittedly it's
Ryan Harper wrote:
> Playing around with running VMware-server within a KVM guest and noticed
> that whenever we launch a VM within the guest, KVM reports a GP fault in
> set_cr3. Removing the fault injection (raised for attempting to set
> reserved bits) for the non-pae case allows memtest to boo
It works for me... I'm able to reboot a windows 2003 server R2 as well as
windows XP service pack 1.
On 9/23/07, Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Haydn Solomon wrote:
> > You guys are quick! Ok, kvm-39 allows me to run my windows xp machine
> > now. I just have one question that I'm not
My apologies... these two vms are standard pc HAL.
On 9/23/07, Haydn Solomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It works for me... I'm able to reboot a windows 2003 server R2 as well as
> windows XP service pack 1.
>
> On 9/23/07, Avi Kivity < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Haydn Solomon wrote:
> >
An important fix to guest smp (it boots now!), and a performance
improvement on Intel hardware. I get about 5% boost on a kernel build.
There's a new module parameter to kvm-intel.ko that can disable this
mechanism, bypass_guest_pf. Load the module with bypass_guest_pf=0 to
disable the optimi
Avi Kivity wrote:
> Scott Serr wrote:
>> I must use VMware sometimes for colaboration projects where others
>> are using VMware. And also a situation where I have a VERY old
>> development environment perfectly tweaked on Win98. I have to do one
>> of these say 10% of the time.
>>
>> 100% of t
Scott Serr wrote:
>>
>> I believe VMware uses real mode transiently, which is not possible
>> when vmx extensions are enabled. So using VMware and kvm
>> concurrently is not possible.
>>
>> Maybe one of the following will suit:
>> - run the Windows 98 image in qemu (without kvm). This will have
Avi Kivity wrote:
> An important fix to guest smp (it boots now!), and a performance
> improvement on Intel hardware. I get about 5% boost on a kernel build.
>
> There's a new module parameter to kvm-intel.ko that can disable this
> mechanism, bypass_guest_pf. Load the module with bypass_guest
I've run into a nasty bug while trying to install a Linux guest using
VMware Server inside a kvm guest (full dmesg attached and recreate
instructions below bug).
kernel BUG at /opt/tickless/kvm-43/kernel/mmu.c:436!
invalid opcode: [1] SMP
CPU 0
Modules linked in: kvm_amd kvm
Pid: 3274, comm
Hi Ryan,
I had a similar problem yesterday with Xen. I posted it to the Xen
mailing list. Now I'm hopeful of try this in KVM, but it looks like you
aren't having much luck. (stopping on anaconda rings a bell)
Here is part of my post:
Xen HVM = CentOS 4.5
running VMware Server 1.0.4
D+on't let ACG=U p;ass, Gr*ab it M,o.nday
ASSE+T C,API.TAL GP IN*C.
AC,GU
$*1.15
AC+GU A.sset Ca+pit;al Gr+o=up, Inc;. w+ill f.ocus up*on loc=ati.n;g
and i.nvest-i.ng in sma;ll=, pro,f=itab=l+e ente-rpr+i.s*es wi.th
p-r*omi;s
23 matches
Mail list logo
