Hi folks,
I found that Windows guests often fail reboots in current
kvm.git. Either the guest hangs, or it reports double fault exception
which causes qemu aborts. This is not shown with -no-kvm-irqchip option.
After some investigation, it seems that this is caused by lack
of in-ke
He, Qing wrote:
> Hi folks,
> I found that Windows guests often fail reboots in current
> kvm.git. Either the guest hangs, or it reports double fault exception
> which causes qemu aborts. This is not shown with -no-kvm-irqchip option.
>
> After some investigation, it seems that this is
Hi,
is this the same layout introduced for the powerpc port ?
Perhaps you should work together ?
Laurent
Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
> Hi Folks,
> We are working on enabling KVM support on IA64 platform, and now
> Linux, Windows guests get stable run and achieve reasonable performance
> on KVM w
He, Qing wrote:
> Hi folks,
> I found that Windows guests often fail reboots in current
> kvm.git. Either the guest hangs, or it reports double fault exception
> which causes qemu aborts. This is not shown with -no-kvm-irqchip option.
>
> After some investigation, it seems that this is
Mariusz Kozlowski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Similar (the same?) as in 2.6.23-rc6-mm1?
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel%40vger.kernel.org/msg208812.html
>
> CC [M] drivers/kvm/ioapic.o
> drivers/kvm/ioapic.c: In function 'ioapic_deliver':
> drivers/kvm/ioapic.c:208: error: 'des
Klaus Kudielka wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Starting with kvm-40, I am not able to install a Win XP SP2 guest any more.
> I consistently get a BSOD somewhere in the 2nd stage install.
> Sometimes it is IRQL_NOT_LESS_OR_EQUAL, otherwise STOP: 0x008E
> or STOP: 0x000A
>
> In most failure cases I also
Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 19:15 +0200, Dor Laor wrote:
>
>> At the moment it's not good enough, there is a potential race were the
>> guest optimistically turn off
>> the VRING_AVAIL_F_NO_INTERRUPT in the vring_restart and afterwards
>> finds there are more_used so
>> it consu
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 11:00:09 +0200 Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mariusz Kozlowski wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Similar (the same?) as in 2.6.23-rc6-mm1?
> >
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel%40vger.kernel.org/msg208812.html
> >
> > CC [M] drivers/kvm/ioapic.o
> > dri
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 11:00:09 +0200 Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> Mariusz Kozlowski wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Similar (the same?) as in 2.6.23-rc6-mm1?
>>>
>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel%40vger.kernel.org/msg208812.html
>>>
>>>
Bugs item #1802580, was opened at 2007-09-26 17:27
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=893831&aid=1802580&group_id=180599
Please note that this message will contain a full copy
Hi Laurent,
Thanks for your suggestion! Sure that we should work together to come
out the cross-architecture framework. But I think our proposal should be some
different with PPC guys provided after a quick reading their patches, although
we have similar ideas for the effort. Actually,
>
>
> I think #2. Synchronization will be difficult; we'll need to send
> signals to all other vcpus so that they drop the vcpu mutex.
>
How about add a new ABI KVM_RESET_KERNDEVS ?
We don't want to implement RESET ABIs for each kernel devices
especially when we move PIT down and then RTC, pmti
Klaus Kudielka wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Starting with kvm-40, I am not able to install a Win XP SP2 guest any more.
> I consistently get a BSOD somewhere in the 2nd stage install.
> Sometimes it is IRQL_NOT_LESS_OR_EQUAL, otherwise STOP: 0x008E
> or STOP: 0x000A
>
>
can you try runing it with
hi,
there is a strange thing which is just noticed. on our kvm host there is
a ntpd running and synchronize to some time server and it's time is
valid. so i decided that i won't run ntpd on the guest vms since if the
host has the right time probably the guest see the same time. but that's
not the c
Frakas, I just noticed the same thing. This never used to be the case though
as usually they would be exactly the same time.
On 9/26/07, Farkas Levente <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> hi,
> there is a strange thing which is just noticed. on our kvm host there is
> a ntpd running and synchronize to
I know I'm not crazy.. now my host and guest clocks are in sync. I'll leave
the guest running for a while and see if it eventually goes ahead of host.
On 9/26/07, Haydn Solomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Frakas, I just noticed the same thing. This never used to be the case
> though as usually
Title: 保定普赛思恒流泵有限公司
易装型泵头：
YZ1515x，YZ2515x型泵头采用PPS―聚苯硫醚材料，其刚性及结性能更加出众，具备超强的耐高温性、抗腐蚀性，尤其在抗有机溶剂等强化学腐蚀方面表现优异，有效减少了泵头损坏率，使客户的维修、维护成本大大降低。
Title: 保定普赛思恒流泵有限公司
易装型泵头：
YZ1515x，YZ2515x型泵头采用PPS―聚苯硫醚材料，其刚性及结性能更加出众，具备超强的耐高温性、抗腐蚀性，尤其在抗有机溶剂等强化学腐蚀方面表现优异，有效减少了泵头损坏率，使客户的维修、维护成本大大降低。
Title: 保定普赛思恒流泵有限公司
易装型泵头：
YZ1515x，YZ2515x型泵头采用PPS―聚苯硫醚材料，其刚性及结性能更加出众，具备超强的耐高温性、抗腐蚀性，尤其在抗有机溶剂等强化学腐蚀方面表现优异，有效减少了泵头损坏率，使客户的维修、维护成本大大降低。
Hi,
I think there is a bug in qemu RTL8139.
RTL8139 uses:
cpu_register_physical_memory(addr + 0, 0x100, s->rtl8139_mmio_io_addr);
But in the comment of cpu_register_physical_memory() we have:
"'size' must be a multiple of the target page size."
And I think 0x100 is not a multiple of target pa
On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 05:47:20PM +0200, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think there is a bug in qemu RTL8139.
>
> RTL8139 uses:
>
> cpu_register_physical_memory(addr + 0, 0x100, s->rtl8139_mmio_io_addr);
>
> But in the comment of cpu_register_physical_memory() we have:
>
> "'size' must be
On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 06:02:21PM +0200, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 05:47:20PM +0200, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I think there is a bug in qemu RTL8139.
> >>
> >> RTL8139 uses:
> >>
> >> cpu_register_physical_memory(addr + 0, 0x100,
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 05:47:20PM +0200, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I think there is a bug in qemu RTL8139.
>>
>> RTL8139 uses:
>>
>> cpu_register_physical_memory(addr + 0, 0x100, s->rtl8139_mmio_io_addr);
>>
>> But in the comment of cpu_register_physical_memory
I'm trying to get a pre-built vmware image of Windows running on
ubuntu 7.10. I tried running qemu directly on the vmdk file, but that
is extremely slow. For example, it takes about a minute to get the
context menu to come up when you right-click on the desktop. I tried
converting the vmdk to qc
Jared Greenwald wrote:
> I'm trying to get a pre-built vmware image of Windows running on
> ubuntu 7.10. I tried running qemu directly on the vmdk file, but that
> is extremely slow. For example, it takes about a minute to get the
> context menu to come up when you right-click on the desktop. I
Hi Vivier, Avi,
In order to debug faulures in my tree, I was looking at the saved_eip
changes coming from your commit. I did not understand the use of
saved_eip properly. like why is it used in the emulation of the pop
instruction. Can you please help me understand it's usage?
commit 5d9b3
On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 01:51:26PM +0200, Izik Eidus wrote:
> can you try runing it with -no-kvm-irqchip, and report the results?
pretty much the same. I tried -40 and -44 and they both fail with the same
symptom described previously.
Regards, Klaus
--
Kamble, Nitin A wrote:
> Hi Vivier, Avi,
Hi Nitin,
(BTW, my first name is Laurent)
> In order to debug faulures in my tree, I was looking at the saved_eip
> changes coming from your commit. I did not understand the use of
> saved_eip properly. like why is it used in the emulation of the pop
Jared Greenwald wrote:
> On 9/26/07, Cam Macdonell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Jared Greenwald wrote:
>>> I'm trying to get a pre-built vmware image of Windows running on
>>> ubuntu 7.10. I tried running qemu directly on the vmdk file, but that
>>> is extremely slow. For example, it takes about
Hi Laurent,
Sorry for calling by alst name. You 1st & last both names are totally
new to me. Are these french names?
I understand your explanation. I was worried about code getting
misplaced due to automatic merges.
--
Thanks & Regards,
Nitin
Open Source Technology Center, Intel Corporation
--
A Fedora user reported that Vista networking isn't working with KVM[1] and
pointed to the Wiki
http://kvm.qumranet.com/kvmwiki/Vista_Networking_Workaround
FYI, a patch from Xen was merged into upstream QEMU to fix this problem
with rtl8139 a week or two back and works nicely with KVM+Vista...
31 matches
Mail list logo
