From: Zhang Xiantao [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 16:43:24 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] kvm: qemu: No reason to disallow (phys_ram_alloc_offset
+ size) = phys_ram_size
No reason to disallow (phys_ram_alloc_offset + size) = phys_ram_size.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Xiantao [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
According to Avi's comments, Updated the patches.
[1/3] Create ioapic.h and lapic.h to hold their declarations.
[2/3] Moving ioapic{.h,.c} back to common directory.
[3/3] Moving out kvm_vcpu_kick from irq.c
Applied all, thanks.
--
error compiling committee.c:
Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
From: Zhang Xiantao [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 16:43:24 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] kvm: qemu: No reason to disallow (phys_ram_alloc_offset
+ size) = phys_ram_size
No reason to disallow (phys_ram_alloc_offset + size) = phys_ram_size.
Applied, thanks.
--
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 20:27:27 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] kvm: make ioapic structure in irqchip seen by ia64
IA64 also needs to see ioapic structure in irqchip.
Signed-off-by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
include/linux/kvm.h |2 ++
1 files
Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 20:27:27 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] kvm: make ioapic structure in irqchip seen by ia64
IA64 also needs to see ioapic structure in irqchip.
Patch doesn't apply due to whitespace corruption.
--
error
Attached.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 20:27:27 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] kvm: make ioapic structure in irqchip seen by ia64
IA64 also needs to see ioapic structure in irqchip.
Signed-off-by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
include/linux/kvm.h |2 ++
Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
Attached.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 20:27:27 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] kvm: make ioapic structure in irqchip seen by ia64
IA64 also needs to see ioapic structure in irqchip.
Applied, thanks.
--
error compiling committee.c: too
hi,
in the function kvm_init_msr_list(), when will it be true that (j i) ?
in x86.c
the function kvm_arch_init() in x68.c, would it not make sense,
to put the call to kvm_mmu_module_init() and kvm_init_msr_list after
the 3 checks if kvm is already possible on this machine, or is
that
Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
I don't think this is a issue. Since this makefile is located at
arch/{$arch}/kvm. So, you can choose to include it or not.
That is, you can define your own common objs.
Ah :-). Thanks for the explanation.
I had problems getting kvm-intel to work on a Toshiba Portege M400, as
the BIOS clearly stated virtualization was enabled, but KVM stated it
was not. I got errors like:
FATAL: Error inserting kvm_intel
(/lib/modules/2.6.22.10/extra/kvm-intel.ko): Operation not supported
kvm: disabled by bios
Or
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007, David P. Reed wrote:
Avi Kivity wrote:
kvm will forward a virtual machine's writes to port 0x80 to the real
port. The reason is that the write is much faster than exiting and
emulating it; the difference is measurable when compiling kernels.
Now if the cause is simply
On 17-12-07 19:14, linux-os (Dick Johnson) wrote:
Attached is a patch that changes the outs to ins on port 0x80.
No, that isn't useful. Only a write is guaranteed to make ISA/LPC meaning
the timing for a read varies wildly. See the in/out cycles results posted
earlier. Was also reading the
host side TLB flush can be merged together if multiple
spte need to be write-protected.
Signed-off-by: Yaozu (Eddie) Dong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git a/drivers/kvm/mmu.c b/drivers/kvm/mmu.c
index 92ac0d1..749db46 100644
--- a/drivers/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/drivers/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -524,9 +524,9 @@ static
Dor Laor wrote:
Cam Macdonell wrote:
Dor Laor wrote:
Christian Borntraeger wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 12. Dezember 2007 schrieb Dor Laor:
Christian Borntraeger wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 12. Dezember 2007 schrieb Dor Laor:
--- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
@@ -406,10 +405,10
Dong, Eddie wrote:
host side TLB flush can be merged together if multiple
spte need to be write-protected.
Signed-off-by: Yaozu (Eddie) Dong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git a/drivers/kvm/mmu.c b/drivers/kvm/mmu.c
index 92ac0d1..749db46 100644
--- a/drivers/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/drivers/kvm/mmu.c
On Wednesday 12 December 2007 23:54:00 Dor Laor wrote:
commit 763769621d271d92204ed27552d75448587c1ac0
Author: Dor Laor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed Dec 12 14:52:00 2007 +0200
[virtio-net][PATCH] Don't arm tx hrtimer with a constant 50us each
transmit
The current start_xmit sets
您好，我是北京四海恒泰 张力昨天您我有过电话沟通。现将我公司产品服务介绍给您。
我公司服务的特点：1，无需传真机可以随时随地收取发送传真。实现互联网与传统传真机互通。
2，可以同时给3000个号码发送
3，集成短信群发功能
资费：国内发送 长市合一 6秒钟 3分钱
国际资费 北美 香港 每分钟0.56 人民币
在线联系方式 [EMAIL PROTECTED]（Mark）
QQ：78160372 （Mark）
Mark Zhang
MOBIE:+8613001979666
T E L:+861058690807-12
Dong, Eddie wrote:
host side TLB flush can be merged together if multiple
spte need to be write-protected.
Signed-off-by: Yaozu (Eddie) Dong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git a/drivers/kvm/mmu.c b/drivers/kvm/mmu.c
index 92ac0d1..749db46 100644
--- a/drivers/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/drivers/kvm/mmu.c
On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 10:07 +0100, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
Hollis Blanchard wrote:
A comment to explain why the icache needs flushing only in the KVM
case
would be useful. Other than that I'm fine with it.
Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AFAIK Plain qemu does not
Hollis Blanchard wrote:
On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 14:15 +0800, Zhang Wei wrote:
Hollis Blanchard wrote:
On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 18:14 +0800, Zhang Wei wrote:
From: Hollis Blanchard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
We haven't touched the hack code recently, since we've been
refactoring the upstream tree.
--
Best Regards
Yu Fei
-
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services
for just about anything Open Source.
On Friday 14 December 2007 23:12:05 Christian Borntraeger wrote:
Rusty, Anthony, Dor,
I need your brain power :-)
On smp guests I have seen a problem with virtio (the version in curent
Avi's git) which do not occur on single processor guests:
kernel BUG at
On Friday 14 December 2007 05:30:31 Christian Borntraeger wrote:
Rusty, if you decide to apply my patch, there is one downside: The
debugging code in virtio_ring sometimes triggers with a false positive:
try_fill_recv calls vring_kick. Here we do a notify to the host. This might
cause an
On Tuesday 18 December 2007 16:30:08 Avi Kivity wrote:
Rusty Russell wrote:
Yes, I pondered this when I wrote the code. On the one hand, it's a
low-probability pathological corner case, on the other, your patch
reduces the number of timer reprograms in the normal case.
One thing that
24 matches
Mail list logo
