On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 3:10 AM, Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm rooting for btrfs myself.
but could btrfs (when stable) work for migration? i'm curious about
OCFS2 performance on this kind of load...
when i manage to sell the idea of a KVM cluster i'd like to know if i
should try f
What about Lua? (http://www.lua.org)
it started up as a configuration language, and evolved into a full
programming language, while remaining _very_ light (less than 200K
with all libraries), and wonderfully easy to embed into C programs.
it lets you write things like:
drives = {
hda = {if='s
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 10:13 AM, Johannes Schindelin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 14 May 2008, Javier Guerra wrote:
> > What about Lua? (http://www.lua.org)
> >
> > it started up as a configuration language, and evolved into a full
> > programming
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 10:37 AM, Johannes Schindelin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 14 May 2008, Javier Guerra wrote:
> > when embedded, you get to choose what libraries are available. there
> > are several examples of fairly secure settings.
>
> Why artif
On 2/20/08, Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Assuming you have eth0 on the host, tap0 on the host visible as eth0 in
> the guest, and tap1 in the host visible as eth1 in the guest, you can
> add a bridge between eth0 and tap0, and use tap1 as the nic in the host
> for IP (e.g. run 'dhclie
On 3/4/08, Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> apply to kvm guests. With mmu notifiers, the trend will grow even stronger.
could you (or anybody) elaborate on that? the mmu-related threads show
lots of progress, but it's way (way) out of my league.
AFAICT, it's about the infrastructure to l
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 5:37 PM, Dor Laor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We published virtio network drivers for Linux but not yet for Windows.
> Our virtio drivers for windows are almost done (for rev#1), we'll surely
> release the binaries for them.
great!! no need to fool around with xen/vmwa
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 4:38 PM, Matthias Pfafferodt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * set up the bridged network at boot
trivially easy. in fact, it's easier to write a script than to do it by hand.
> * start all domains at boot time (or restore saved domains)
from trivial to moderate, dependin
On 11/28/07, Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Haifeng He wrote:
> > I am pretty new to KVM. I have a question which is if it
> > is possible (or easy) to share memory(such identical pages)
> > among guest OSs in KVM?
>
> In KVM, guest memory is normal userspace memory. So you can use any of
On 12/4/07, Neo Jia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have seen the Qemu is ported to OSX. Is there any plan for KVM? Just
> curious.
similarily, there are OSX installs over VMWare, but haven't seen one on KVM...
--
Javier
-
-- Forwarded message --
From: Javier Guerra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Jan 3, 2008 10:45 AM
Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] kvm 58 and vncviewer
To: Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 1/3/08, Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, you are using vncviewer to view
On 1/7/08, Laurent Vivier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What I'm wondering now is: is it really useful to have "cache=off" and
> "snapshot=on" at the same time ?
does "cache=off" means disk cache? if so, it might be useful to test
clustering filesystems.
so far, the only way is to setup a network
On 1/7/08, Laurent Vivier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "cache=off" means files is opened with "O_DIRECT" and thus there is no
> cache in the kernel memory on the host side.
> IMO, "cache=off" and "snapshot=on" are incompatible because a snapshot
> can be seen like a cache.
>
> > so far, the only wa
On 1/7/08, Laurent Vivier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Le lundi 07 janvier 2008 à 11:03 -0500, Javier Guerra a écrit :
> > hopefully, it would now work with "-cache=off", don't you think?
>
> Well, I don't think the problem is at the host level but at the
On Sunday 20 April 2008, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Also, I'd presume that those that need 10K IOPS and above will not place
> their high throughput images on a filesystem; rather on a separate SAN LUN.
i think that too; but still that LUN would be accessed by the VM's via one of
these IO emulation laye
On Friday 02 May 2008, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> What we really need is a global configuration file so that individual
> users can select these defaults according to what makes sense for them.
i favor the idea of writing parameters into the boot image itself.
--
Javier
signature.asc
Description
On Wednesday 09 January 2008, Dor Laor wrote:
> Some figures: Linux rx 350Mbps, tx 150bps, Windows rx 700mbps, tx 100 mbps.
very nice!
in a related note, the VMWare tools package, which is supposed to 'enhance
performance' by installing 'specially tuned' drivers into a guest, doesn't
include ne
17 matches
Mail list logo
