On Thu, 2008-03-06 at 14:56 -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Avi Kivity wrote:
The thing I'm trying to get at is a quantitative statement about why
moving the pit into the kernel is the right thing. I'll try to give
the patches a try myself in the next couple of days. I don't think
On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 18:50 -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Dor Laor wrote:
On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 09:52 -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Yang, Sheng wrote:
Hi
Here is the last in-kernel PIT patch for KVM. The mainly change from last
version is the supporting to save/restore.
Dor Laor wrote:
On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 18:50 -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Dor Laor wrote:
I thought there was some discussion about whether -tdf was every useful
in practice?
It works.
Just try to play a movie in windows standard HAL with and w/o -tdf
--no-irq-chip and
Anthony Liguori wrote:
Playing a movie is a bit subjective. I presume you're talking about the
standard HAL as presumably the ACPI HAL is using the pm timer?
ACPI HAL uses the apic timer, IIRC; perhaps the pm timer as well.
So the two cases I'm hearing where timer accuracy should
On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 17:05 -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Dor Laor wrote:
On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 19:30 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
Playing a movie is better than any benchmark; it reflects actual user
experience in a real and important use case. Benchmarks are substitutes
for real
Hi
Here is the last in-kernel PIT patch for KVM. The mainly change from last
version is the supporting to save/restore. I also tested live migration.
The other modifies including some date structure changed to be better for
supporting the save/restore. I moved the PIT timer to outside of
Yang, Sheng wrote:
Hi
Here is the last in-kernel PIT patch for KVM. The mainly change from last
version is the supporting to save/restore. I also tested live migration.
The other modifies including some date structure changed to be better for
supporting the save/restore. I moved the PIT
On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 09:52 -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Yang, Sheng wrote:
Hi
Here is the last in-kernel PIT patch for KVM. The mainly change from last
version is the supporting to save/restore. I also tested live migration.
The other modifies including some date structure changed
Dor Laor wrote:
On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 09:52 -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Yang, Sheng wrote:
Hi
Here is the last in-kernel PIT patch for KVM. The mainly change from last
version is the supporting to save/restore. I also tested live migration.
The other modifies including some
On Wednesday 05 March 2008 08:50:24 Anthony Liguori wrote:
Dor Laor wrote:
On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 09:52 -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Yang, Sheng wrote:
Hi
Here is the last in-kernel PIT patch for KVM. The mainly change from
last version is the supporting to save/restore. I also tested
Yang, Sheng wrote:
On Wednesday 05 March 2008 08:50:24 Anthony Liguori wrote:
So how do we measure the benefits of an in-kernel PIT?
On the time accuracy side, one typical example is in RHEL5 32E guest, time
flows very slow compared to the host
On Wednesday 05 March 2008 12:25:07 Anthony Liguori wrote:
Yang, Sheng wrote:
On Wednesday 05 March 2008 08:50:24 Anthony Liguori wrote:
So how do we measure the benefits of an in-kernel PIT?
On the time accuracy side, one typical example is in RHEL5 32E guest,
time flows very slow
12 matches
Mail list logo
