On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 03:31:03PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
Hi Avi,
This is my current patch queue for ppc. Please pull.
Alex
The following changes since commit 188fc33198ddb1469562d40de33bcc29e7e2ed5f:
Christian Borntraeger (1):
kvm-s390: provide access guest registers
On 20.12.2011, at 11:37, Paul Mackerras wrote:
This adds code to measure stolen time per virtual core in units of
timebase ticks, and to report the stolen time to the guest using the
dispatch trace log (DTL). The guest can register an area of memory
for the DTL for a given vcpu. The DTL is
On 13.01.2012, at 07:09, Paul Mackerras wrote:
This moves __gfn_to_memslot() and search_memslots() from kvm_main.c to
kvm_host.h to reduce the code duplication caused by the need for
non-modular code in arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rm_mmu.c to call
gfn_to_memslot() in real mode.
Rather than
On 01/16/2012 03:18 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
Avi?
ACK!
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm-ppc in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
On 13.01.2012, at 07:09, Paul Mackerras wrote:
This moves __gfn_to_memslot() and search_memslots() from kvm_main.c to
kvm_host.h to reduce the code duplication caused by the need for
non-modular code in arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rm_mmu.c to call
gfn_to_memslot() in real mode.
Rather than
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 02:04:29PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 20.12.2011, at 11:22, Paul Mackerras wrote:
@@ -152,6 +152,8 @@ static unsigned long do_h_register_vpa(struct kvm_vcpu
*vcpu,
flags = 7;
if (flags == 0 || flags == 4)
This could probably use a new variable
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 02:30:41PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
Which tree is this against? I got this diff between your patch and the patch
when applied on my tree:
It's against your tree (previously) plus my first 13-patch series, but
not the second series of 5 patches, which presumably why
