> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alexander Graf [mailto:ag...@suse.de]
> Sent: Friday, May 10, 2013 11:14 PM
> To: Bhushan Bharat-R65777
> Cc: kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org; k...@vger.kernel.org; Wood Scott-B07421;
> tiejun.c...@windriver.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: PPC: Add userspace debug stub support
> 
> 
> On 10.05.2013, at 19:31, Bhushan Bharat-R65777 wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Alexander Graf [mailto:ag...@suse.de]
> >> Sent: Friday, May 10, 2013 3:48 PM
> >> To: Bhushan Bharat-R65777
> >> Cc: kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org; k...@vger.kernel.org; Wood Scott-B07421;
> >> tiejun.c...@windriver.com; Bhushan Bharat-R65777
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: PPC: Add userspace debug stub support
> >>
> >>
> >> On 07.05.2013, at 11:40, Bharat Bhushan wrote:
> >>
> >>> This patch adds the debug stub support on booke/bookehv.
> >>> Now QEMU debug stub can use hw breakpoint, watchpoint and software
> >>> breakpoint to debug guest.
> >>>
> >>> This is how we save/restore debug register context when switching
> >>> between guest, userspace and kernel user-process:
> >>>
> >>> When QEMU is running
> >>> -> thread->debug_reg == QEMU debug register context.
> >>> -> Kernel will handle switching the debug register on context switch.
> >>> -> no vcpu_load() called
> >>>
> >>> QEMU makes ioctls (except RUN)
> >>> -> This will call vcpu_load()
> >>> -> should not change context.
> >>> -> Some ioctls can change vcpu debug register, context saved in
> >>> -> vcpu->debug_regs
> >>>
> >>> QEMU Makes RUN ioctl
> >>> -> Save thread->debug_reg on STACK
> >>> -> Store thread->debug_reg == vcpu->debug_reg load thread->debug_reg
> >>> -> RUN VCPU ( So thread points to vcpu context )
> >>>
> >>> Context switch happens When VCPU running
> >>> -> makes vcpu_load() should not load any context kernel loads the
> >>> -> vcpu context as thread->debug_regs points to vcpu context.
> >>>
> >>> On heavyweight_exit
> >>> -> Load the context saved on stack in thread->debug_reg
> >>>
> >>> Currently we do not support debug resource emulation to guest, On
> >>> debug exception, always exit to user space irrespective of user
> >>> space is expecting the debug exception or not. If this is unexpected
> >>> exception (breakpoint/watchpoint event not set by
> >>> userspace) then let us leave the action on user space. This is
> >>> similar to what it was before, only thing is that now we have proper
> >>> exit state available to user space.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Bharat Bhushan <bharat.bhus...@freescale.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h |    3 +
> >>> arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h |    1 +
> >>> arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c            |  242 
> >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> --
> >>> arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.h            |    5 +
> >>> 4 files changed, 233 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> >>> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> >>> index 838a577..1b29945 100644
> >>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> >>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> >>> @@ -524,7 +524,10 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
> >>>   u32 eptcfg;
> >>>   u32 epr;
> >>>   u32 crit_save;
> >>> + /* guest debug registers*/
> >>>   struct debug_reg dbg_reg;
> >>> + /* shadow debug registers */
> >>
> >> Please be more verbose here. What exactly does this contain? Why do
> >> we need shadow and non-shadow registers? The comment as it is reads
> >> like
> >>
> >>  /* Add one plus one */
> >>  x = 1 + 1;
> >
> >
> > /*
> > * Shadow debug registers hold the debug register content
> > * to be written in h/w debug register on behalf of guest
> > * written value or user space written value.
> > */
> 
> /* hardware visible debug registers when in guest state */
> 
> >
> >
> >>
> >>> + struct debug_reg shadow_dbg_reg;
> >>> #endif
> >>>   gpa_t paddr_accessed;
> >>>   gva_t vaddr_accessed;
> >>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> >>> b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> >>> index ded0607..f5077c2 100644
> >>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> >>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> >>> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
> >>> #define __KVM_HAVE_PPC_SMT
> >>> #define __KVM_HAVE_IRQCHIP
> >>> #define __KVM_HAVE_IRQ_LINE
> >>> +#define __KVM_HAVE_GUEST_DEBUG
> >>>
> >>> struct kvm_regs {
> >>>   __u64 pc;
> >>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c
> >>> index
> >>> ef99536..6a44ad4 100644
> >>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c
> >>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c
> >>> @@ -133,6 +133,29 @@ static void kvmppc_vcpu_sync_fpu(struct
> >>> kvm_vcpu
> >>> *vcpu) #endif }
> >>>
> >>> +static void kvmppc_vcpu_sync_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {
> >>> + /* Synchronize guest's desire to get debug interrupts into shadow
> >>> +MSR */ #ifndef CONFIG_KVM_BOOKE_HV
> >>> + vcpu->arch.shadow_msr &= ~MSR_DE;
> >>> + vcpu->arch.shadow_msr |= vcpu->arch.shared->msr & MSR_DE; #endif
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Force enable debug interrupts when user space wants to debug */
> >>> + if (vcpu->guest_debug) {
> >>> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_BOOKE_HV
> >>> +         /*
> >>> +          * Since there is no shadow MSR, sync MSR_DE into the guest
> >>> +          * visible MSR.
> >>> +          */
> >>> +         vcpu->arch.shared->msr |= MSR_DE; #else
> >>> +         vcpu->arch.shadow_msr |= MSR_DE;
> >>> +         vcpu->arch.shared->msr &= ~MSR_DE; #endif
> >>> + }
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> /*
> >>> * Helper function for "full" MSR writes.  No need to call this if
> >>> only
> >>> * EE/CE/ME/DE/RI are changing.
> >>> @@ -150,6 +173,7 @@ void kvmppc_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 
> >>> new_msr)
> >>>   kvmppc_mmu_msr_notify(vcpu, old_msr);
> >>>   kvmppc_vcpu_sync_spe(vcpu);
> >>>   kvmppc_vcpu_sync_fpu(vcpu);
> >>> + kvmppc_vcpu_sync_debug(vcpu);
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> static void kvmppc_booke_queue_irqprio(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, @@
> >>> -655,6 +679,7 @@ int kvmppc_core_check_requests(struct kvm_vcpu
> >>> *vcpu) int kvmppc_vcpu_run(struct kvm_run *kvm_run, struct kvm_vcpu 
> >>> *vcpu) {
> >>>   int ret, s;
> >>> + struct debug_reg debug;
> >>> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_FPU
> >>>   unsigned int fpscr;
> >>>   int fpexc_mode;
> >>> @@ -699,11 +724,27 @@ int kvmppc_vcpu_run(struct kvm_run *kvm_run,
> >>> struct
> >> kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> >>>   kvmppc_load_guest_fp(vcpu);
> >>> #endif
> >>>
> >>> + /*
> >>> +  * Clear current->thread.dbcr0 so that kernel does not
> >>> +  * restore h/w registers on context switch in vcpu running state.
> >>> +  */
> >>
> >> Incorrect comment?
> >
> > Leftover from previous code, will remove this.
> >
> >>
> >>> + /* Save thread->debug context on stack */
> >>
> >> /* Switch to guest debug context */
> >>
> >>> + memcpy(&debug, &current->thread.debug, sizeof(struct debug_reg));
> >>
> >> debug = current->thread.debug;
> >>
> >>> + /* Load vcpu debug context in thread->debug */
> >>> + memcpy(&current->thread.debug, &vcpu->arch.shadow_dbg_reg,
> >>> +        sizeof(struct debug_reg));
> >>
> >> current->thread.debug = vcpu->arch.shadow_dbg_reg;
> >>
> >>> +
> >>> + switch_booke_debug_regs(&current->thread);
> >>> +
> >>>   ret = __kvmppc_vcpu_run(kvm_run, vcpu);
> >>>
> >>>   /* No need for kvm_guest_exit. It's done in handle_exit.
> >>>      We also get here with interrupts enabled. */
> >>>
> >>> + /* Restore userspace context in thread->dbcr0 from stack*/
> >>
> >> /* Switch back to user space debug context */
> >>
> >>> + memcpy(&current->thread.debug, &debug, sizeof(struct debug_reg));
> >>
> >> current->thread.debug = debug;
> >>
> >>> + switch_booke_debug_regs(&current->thread);
> >>> +
> >>> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_FPU
> >>>   kvmppc_save_guest_fp(vcpu);
> >>>
> >>> @@ -759,6 +800,36 @@ static int emulation_exit(struct kvm_run *run,
> >>> struct
> >> kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> >>>   }
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> +/*
> >>> + * Currently we do not support debug resource emulation to guest,
> >>> + * so always exit to user space irrespective of user space is
> >>> + * expecting the debug exception or not. This is unexpected event
> >>> + * and let us leave the action on user space.
> >>
> >> Please rework your wording.
> >>
> >>> + */
> >>> +static int kvmppc_handle_debug(struct kvm_run *run, struct kvm_vcpu
> >>> +*vcpu) {
> >>> + struct debug_reg *dbg_reg = &(vcpu->arch.shadow_dbg_reg);
> >>> + u32 dbsr = vcpu->arch.dbsr;
> >>> +
> >>> + run->debug.arch.status = 0;
> >>> + run->debug.arch.address = vcpu->arch.pc;
> >>> +
> >>> + if (dbsr & (DBSR_IAC1 | DBSR_IAC2 | DBSR_IAC3 | DBSR_IAC4)) {
> >>> +         run->debug.arch.status |= KVMPPC_DEBUG_BREAKPOINT;
> >>> + } else {
> >>> +         if (dbsr & (DBSR_DAC1W | DBSR_DAC2W))
> >>> +                 run->debug.arch.status |= KVMPPC_DEBUG_WATCH_WRITE;
> >>> +         else if (dbsr & (DBSR_DAC1R | DBSR_DAC2R))
> >>> +                 run->debug.arch.status |= KVMPPC_DEBUG_WATCH_READ;
> >>> +         if (dbsr & (DBSR_DAC1R | DBSR_DAC1W))
> >>> +                 run->debug.arch.address = dbg_reg->dac1;
> >>> +         else if (dbsr & (DBSR_DAC2R | DBSR_DAC2W))
> >>> +                 run->debug.arch.address = dbg_reg->dac2;
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + return RESUME_HOST;
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> static void kvmppc_fill_pt_regs(struct pt_regs *regs) {
> >>>   ulong r1, ip, msr, lr;
> >>> @@ -819,6 +890,11 @@ static void kvmppc_restart_interrupt(struct
> >>> kvm_vcpu
> >> *vcpu,
> >>>   case BOOKE_INTERRUPT_CRITICAL:
> >>>           unknown_exception(&regs);
> >>>           break;
> >>> + case BOOKE_INTERRUPT_DEBUG:
> >>> +         /* Save DBSR before preemption is enabled */
> >>> +         vcpu->arch.dbsr = mfspr(SPRN_DBSR);
> >>> +         kvmppc_clear_dbsr();
> >>> +         break;
> >>>   }
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> @@ -1118,18 +1194,10 @@ int kvmppc_handle_exit(struct kvm_run *run,
> >>> struct
> >> kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> >>>   }
> >>>
> >>>   case BOOKE_INTERRUPT_DEBUG: {
> >>> -         u32 dbsr;
> >>> -
> >>> -         vcpu->arch.pc = mfspr(SPRN_CSRR0);
> >>> -
> >>> -         /* clear IAC events in DBSR register */
> >>> -         dbsr = mfspr(SPRN_DBSR);
> >>> -         dbsr &= DBSR_IAC1 | DBSR_IAC2 | DBSR_IAC3 | DBSR_IAC4;
> >>> -         mtspr(SPRN_DBSR, dbsr);
> >>> -
> >>> -         run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_DEBUG;
> >>> +         r = kvmppc_handle_debug(run, vcpu);
> >>> +         if (r == RESUME_HOST)
> >>> +                 run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_DEBUG;
> >>>           kvmppc_account_exit(vcpu, DEBUG_EXITS);
> >>> -         r = RESUME_HOST;
> >>>           break;
> >>>   }
> >>>
> >>> @@ -1180,7 +1248,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_setup(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> >>>   kvmppc_set_msr(vcpu, 0);
> >>>
> >>> #ifndef CONFIG_KVM_BOOKE_HV
> >>> - vcpu->arch.shadow_msr = MSR_USER | MSR_DE | MSR_IS | MSR_DS;
> >>> + vcpu->arch.shadow_msr = MSR_USER | MSR_IS | MSR_DS;
> >>>   vcpu->arch.shadow_pid = 1;
> >>>   vcpu->arch.shared->msr = 0;
> >>> #endif
> >>> @@ -1557,12 +1625,6 @@ int kvm_vcpu_ioctl_set_one_reg(struct
> >>> kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> >> struct kvm_one_reg *reg)
> >>>   return r;
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> -int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_guest_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> >>> -                                  struct kvm_guest_debug *dbg)
> >>> -{
> >>> - return -EINVAL;
> >>> -}
> >>> -
> >>> int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_get_fpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct
> >>> kvm_fpu
> >>> *fpu) {
> >>>   return -ENOTSUPP;
> >>> @@ -1668,6 +1730,145 @@ void kvmppc_decrementer_func(unsigned long data)
> >>>   kvmppc_set_tsr_bits(vcpu, TSR_DIS); }
> >>>
> >>> +static int kvmppc_booke_set_breakpoint(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> >>> +uint64_t addr,
> >>
> >> s/set/add/
> >>
> >>> +                                int index)
> >>> +{
> >>> + struct debug_reg *dbg_reg = &(vcpu->arch.shadow_dbg_reg);
> >>> +
> >>> + switch (index) {
> >>> + case 0:
> >>> +         dbg_reg->dbcr0 |= DBCR0_IAC1 | DBCR0_IDM;
> >>> +         dbg_reg->iac1 = addr;
> >>> +         break;
> >>> + case 1:
> >>> +         dbg_reg->dbcr0 |= DBCR0_IAC2 | DBCR0_IDM;
> >>> +         dbg_reg->iac2 = addr;
> >>> +         break;
> >>> +#if CONFIG_PPC_ADV_DEBUG_IACS > 2
> >>> + case 2:
> >>> +         dbg_reg->dbcr0 |= DBCR0_IAC3 | DBCR0_IDM;
> >>> +         dbg_reg->iac3 = addr;
> >>> +         break;
> >>> + case 3:
> >>> +         dbg_reg->dbcr0 |= DBCR0_IAC4 | DBCR0_IDM;
> >>> +         dbg_reg->iac4 = addr;
> >>> +         break;
> >>> +#endif
> >>> + default:
> >>> +         return -EINVAL;
> >>> + }
> >>
> >>    dbg_reg->dbcr0 |= DBCR0_IDM;
> >>
> >>> + return 0;
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static int kvmppc_booke_set_watchpoint(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> >>> +uint64_t addr,
> >>
> >> s/set/add/
> >>
> >>> +                                int type, int index)
> >>> +{
> >>> + struct debug_reg *dbg_reg = &(vcpu->arch.shadow_dbg_reg);
> >>> +
> >>> + switch (index) {
> >>> + case 0:
> >>> +         if (type & KVMPPC_DEBUG_WATCH_READ)
> >>> +                 dbg_reg->dbcr0 |= DBCR0_DAC1R | DBCR0_IDM;
> >>> +         if (type & KVMPPC_DEBUG_WATCH_WRITE)
> >>> +                 dbg_reg->dbcr0 |= DBCR0_DAC1W | DBCR0_IDM;
> >>> +         dbg_reg->dac1 = addr;
> >>> +         break;
> >>> + case 1:
> >>> +         if (type & KVMPPC_DEBUG_WATCH_READ)
> >>> +                 dbg_reg->dbcr0 |= DBCR0_DAC2R | DBCR0_IDM;
> >>> +         if (type & KVMPPC_DEBUG_WATCH_WRITE)
> >>> +                 dbg_reg->dbcr0 |= DBCR0_DAC2W | DBCR0_IDM;
> >>> +         dbg_reg->dac2 = addr;
> >>> +         break;
> >>> + default:
> >>> +         return -EINVAL;
> >>> + }
> >>
> >>    dbg_reg->dbcr0 |= DBCR0_IDM;
> >>
> >>> + return 0;
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_guest_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> >>> +                                  struct kvm_guest_debug *dbg)
> >>> +{
> >>> + struct debug_reg *dbg_reg;
> >>> + int n, b = 0, w = 0;
> >>> +
> >>> + if (!(dbg->control & KVM_GUESTDBG_ENABLE)) {
> >>> +         /* Clear All debug events */
> >>> +         vcpu->arch.shadow_dbg_reg.dbcr0 = 0;
> >>> +         vcpu->guest_debug = 0;
> >>> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_BOOKE_HV
> >>> +         /*
> >>> +          * When user space is not using the debug resources
> >>> +          * then allow guest to change the MSR.DE.
> >>> +          */
> >>> +         vcpu->arch.shadow_msrp &= ~MSRP_DEP; #endif
> >>
> >> guest_may_set_msr_de(vcpu, true);
> >>
> >>> +         return 0;
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_BOOKE_HV
> >>> + /*
> >>> +  * When user space is using the debug resource then
> >>> +  * do not allow guest to change the MSR.DE.
> >>> +  */
> >>> + vcpu->arch.shadow_msrp |= MSRP_DEP; #endif
> >>
> >> guest_may_set_msr_de(vcpu, false);
> >>
> >>> + vcpu->guest_debug = dbg->control;
> >>> + vcpu->arch.shadow_dbg_reg.dbcr0 = 0;
> >>> + /* Set DBCR0_EDM in guest visible DBCR0 register. */
> >>> + vcpu->arch.dbg_reg.dbcr0 = DBCR0_EDM;
> >>> +
> >>> + if (vcpu->guest_debug & KVM_GUESTDBG_SINGLESTEP)
> >>> +         vcpu->arch.shadow_dbg_reg.dbcr0 |= DBCR0_IDM | DBCR0_IC;
> >>> +
> >>> + if (!(vcpu->guest_debug & KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_HW_BP))
> >>> +         return 0;
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Code below handles only HW breakpoints */
> >>> + dbg_reg = &(vcpu->arch.shadow_dbg_reg);
> >>> +
> >>> + /*
> >>> +  * On BOOKE (e500v2); Set DBCR1 and DBCR2 to allow debug events
> >>> +  * to occur when MSR.PR is set.
> >>> +  * On BOOKE-HV (e500mc+); MSR.PR = 0 when guest is running. So we
> >>> +  * should clear DBCR1 and DBCR2. And EPCR.DUVD is used to control
> >>> +  * that debug events will not come in hypervisor (GS = 0).
> >
> > Will rework the above comment as discussed.
> >
> >>
> >> This is still wrong. We want to trap in PR=1. It's what PR KVM does,
> >> it's what TCG does. There is no point in making HV KVM behave differently.
> >
> > This comment is not valid.
> >
> >>
> >>> +  */
> >>> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_BOOKE_HV
> >>> + dbg_reg->dbcr1 = 0;
> >>> + dbg_reg->dbcr2 = 0;
> >>> +#else
> >>> + dbg_reg->dbcr1 = DBCR1_IAC1US | DBCR1_IAC2US | DBCR1_IAC3US |
> >>> +                   DBCR1_IAC4US;
> >>> + dbg_reg->dbcr2 = DBCR2_DAC1US | DBCR2_DAC2US; #endif
> >>> +
> >>> + for (n = 0; n < (KVMPPC_BOOKE_IAC_NUM + KVMPPC_BOOKE_DAC_NUM); n++) {
> >>> +         uint64_t addr = dbg->arch.bp[n].addr;
> >>> +         uint32_t type = dbg->arch.bp[n].type;
> >>> +
> >>> +         if (type == KVMPPC_DEBUG_NONE)
> >>> +                 continue;
> >>> +
> >>> +         if (type & !(KVMPPC_DEBUG_WATCH_READ |
> >>> +                      KVMPPC_DEBUG_WATCH_WRITE |
> >>> +                      KVMPPC_DEBUG_BREAKPOINT))
> >>> +                 return -EINVAL;
> >>> +
> >>> +         if (type & KVMPPC_DEBUG_BREAKPOINT) {
> >>> +                 /* Setting H/W breakpoint */
> >>> +                 if (kvmppc_booke_set_breakpoint(vcpu, addr, b++))
> >>
> >> Please pass dbg_reg into the function
> >>
> >>> +                         return -EINVAL;
> >>> +         } else {
> >>> +                 /* Setting H/W watchpoint */
> >>> +                 if (kvmppc_booke_set_watchpoint(vcpu, addr, type, w++))
> >>
> >> here too
> >>
> >>> +                         return -EINVAL;
> >>> +         }
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + return 0;
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> void kvmppc_booke_vcpu_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cpu) {
> >>>   vcpu->cpu = smp_processor_id();
> >>> @@ -1678,6 +1879,11 @@ void kvmppc_booke_vcpu_put(struct kvm_vcpu
> >>> *vcpu) {
> >>>   current->thread.kvm_vcpu = NULL;
> >>>   vcpu->cpu = -1;
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Disable all debug events */
> >>> + mtspr(SPRN_DBCR0, 0x0);
> >>
> >> Why? Wouldn't normal preemption handling take care of this already?
> >
> > Yes, normal preemption will take care. On vcpu_put we do not clear EPCR.DUVD
> and DBCR1/2.
> > So debug event will not be taken in host.
> >
> > So yes, it is not needed here.
> >
> >>
> >>> + /* Clear pending debug event in DBSR */
> >>> + kvmppc_clear_dbsr();
> >>
> >> Is there a chance we will ever have to do this? On debug exits from
> >> guest context we already clear dbsr.
> >
> > DBSR can have events captured but not delivered as interrupt if MSR.DE is
> clear. I know with qemu debug stub we do not allow msr.de to be cleared by
> guest.
> 
> I see. In that case we'd have to save the original DBSR value into vcpu->arch
> though, no? Otherwise we might lose guest debug events on preemption if we
> simply clear it.

We do not want to keep the delayed debug events as they does not carry much 
value. Example: taking h/w breakpoint at some other execution address.

-Bharat

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm-ppc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to