Paul Mackerras pau...@samba.org writes:
This corrects the usage of the tlbie (TLB invalidate entry) instruction
in HV KVM. The tlbie instruction changed between PPC970 and POWER7.
On the PPC970, the bit to select large vs. small page is in the instruction,
not in the RB register value. This
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 06:04:34PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
On 07/16/2013 01:35:55 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 01:17:33PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
On 07/15/2013 06:30:20 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
There is no much sense to share hypercalls between architectures.
There
is
On 17.07.2013, at 13:00, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 06:04:34PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
On 07/16/2013 01:35:55 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 01:17:33PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
On 07/15/2013 06:30:20 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
There is no much sense to share
err was overwritten by a previous function call, and checked to be 0. If
the following page allocation fails, 0 is going to be returned instead
of -ENOMEM.
Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo casca...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
---
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_pr.c |5 +++--
1 files changed, 3
On 17.07.2013, at 17:19, Yoder Stuart-B08248 wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Alexander Graf [mailto:ag...@suse.de]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 7:19 AM
To: Gleb Natapov
Cc: Wood Scott-B07421; Bhushan Bharat-R65777; k...@vger.kernel.org;
kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org; Yoder
-Original Message-
From: Alexander Graf [mailto:ag...@suse.de]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 7:19 AM
To: Gleb Natapov
Cc: Wood Scott-B07421; Bhushan Bharat-R65777; k...@vger.kernel.org;
kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org; Yoder
Stuart-B08248; Bhushan Bharat-R65777
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5]
-Original Message-
From: Alexander Graf [mailto:ag...@suse.de]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 10:21 AM
To: Yoder Stuart-B08248
Cc: Wood Scott-B07421; Bhushan Bharat-R65777; k...@vger.kernel.org;
kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org; Gleb Natapov
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] booke: define reset
On 17.07.2013, at 13:00, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 06:04:34PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
On 07/16/2013 01:35:55 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 01:17:33PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
On 07/15/2013 06:30:20 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
There is no much sense to
On 17.07.2013, at 18:21, Bhushan Bharat-R65777 wrote:
On 17.07.2013, at 13:00, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 06:04:34PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
On 07/16/2013 01:35:55 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 01:17:33PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
On 07/15/2013 06:30:20
On 07/17/2013 11:04:08 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 17.07.2013, at 17:59, Bhushan Bharat-R65777 wrote:
Ah, so we can choose any address range in ccsr space of a PV
machine (-M ppce500 / e500plat).
No, we don't put it in CCSR space. It'd just be orthogonal to CCSR.
I'd rather we put it
On 17.07.2013, at 18:59, Scott Wood wrote:
On 07/17/2013 11:04:08 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 17.07.2013, at 17:59, Bhushan Bharat-R65777 wrote:
Ah, so we can choose any address range in ccsr space of a PV machine (-M
ppce500 / e500plat).
No, we don't put it in CCSR space. It'd just be
On 07/17/2013 12:05:41 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 17.07.2013, at 18:59, Scott Wood wrote:
On 07/17/2013 11:04:08 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 17.07.2013, at 17:59, Bhushan Bharat-R65777 wrote:
Ah, so we can choose any address range in ccsr space of a PV
machine (-M ppce500 / e500plat).
12 matches
Mail list logo
