RE: vfio for platform devices - 9/5/2012 - minutes

2013-09-11 Thread Yoder Stuart-B08248
> -Original Message- > From: Yoder Stuart-B08248 > Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 12:51 PM > To: Wood Scott-B07421; Sethi Varun-B16395; Bhushan Bharat-R65777; 'Peter > Maydell'; 'Santosh Shukla'; 'Alex Williamson'; 'Alexander Graf'; > 'Antonios Motakis'; 'Christoffer Dall'; 'kim.phill

Re: vfio for platform devices - 9/5/2012 - minutes

2013-09-11 Thread Alex Williamson
On Wed, 2013-09-11 at 16:42 +, Yoder Stuart-B08248 wrote: > > > -Original Message- > > From: Yoder Stuart-B08248 > > Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 12:51 PM > > To: Wood Scott-B07421; Sethi Varun-B16395; Bhushan Bharat-R65777; 'Peter > > Maydell'; 'Santosh Shukla'; 'Alex Williamson

Re: vfio for platform devices - 9/5/2012 - minutes

2013-09-11 Thread Scott Wood
On Wed, 2013-09-11 at 11:42 -0500, Yoder Stuart-B08248 wrote: > One thing we didn't discuss needs to be considered (probably by > Kim who is looking at the 'binding device' issue) is around > returning a passthru device back to the host. > > After a platform device has been bound to vfio and is in

Re: [PATCH 00/11] HV KVM improvements in preparation for POWER8 support

2013-09-11 Thread Paul Mackerras
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 01:10:03PM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote: > This series of patches is based on Alex Graf's kvm-ppc-queue branch. > It fixes some bugs, makes some more registers accessible through the > one_reg interface, and implements some missing features such as > support for the compatibi