On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 10:00:59AM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 09:34:01PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 09:24:14PM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 03:32:53PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 07:18:40PM
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 09:34:01PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 09:24:14PM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 03:32:53PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 07:18:40PM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
This implements a simple way to
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 03:32:53PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 07:18:40PM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
This implements a simple way to express the case of IRQ routing where
there is one in-kernel PIC and the system interrupts (GSIs) are routed
1-1 to the corresponding
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 09:24:14PM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 03:32:53PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 07:18:40PM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
This implements a simple way to express the case of IRQ routing where
there is one in-kernel PIC
This implements a simple way to express the case of IRQ routing where
there is one in-kernel PIC and the system interrupts (GSIs) are routed
1-1 to the corresponding pins of the PIC. This is expressed by having
kvm-irq_routing == NULL with a skeleton irq routing entry in the new
