-Original Message-
From: Alexander Graf [mailto:ag...@suse.de]
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 4:46 PM
To: Bhushan Bharat-R65777
Cc: Wood Scott-B07421; kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org; k...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] kvm/powerpc: rename kvm_hypercall() to
epapr_hypercall
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] kvm/powerpc: rename kvm_hypercall() to
epapr_hypercall()
On 04.10.2013, at 06:26, Bhushan Bharat-R65777 wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Wood Scott-B07421
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2013 12:04 AM
To: Alexander Graf
Cc: Bhushan Bharat-R65777; kvm-ppc
at least when I can avoid it. With the current code the compiler
would be
smart enough to just optimize out the complete branch.
Sure. My point is, where would you be calling that where the
entire file isn't predicated on (or selecting) CONFIG_KVM_GUEST or
similar?
We don't do
On 07.10.2013, at 17:43, Bhushan Bharat-R65777 r65...@freescale.com wrote:
at least when I can avoid it. With the current code the compiler
would be
smart enough to just optimize out the complete branch.
Sure. My point is, where would you be calling that where the
entire file isn't
] kvm/powerpc: rename kvm_hypercall() to
epapr_hypercall()
On 07.10.2013, at 17:43, Bhushan Bharat-R65777 r65...@freescale.com wrote:
at least when I can avoid it. With the current code the
compiler would be
smart enough to just optimize out the complete branch.
Sure. My point
-B07421; kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org; k...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] kvm/powerpc: rename kvm_hypercall() to
epapr_hypercall()
On 07.10.2013, at 17:43, Bhushan Bharat-R65777 r65...@freescale.com wrote:
at least when I can avoid it. With the current code the
compiler would
-Original Message-
From: Alexander Graf [mailto:ag...@suse.de]
Sent: Monday, October 07, 2013 9:43 PM
To: Bhushan Bharat-R65777
Cc: Wood Scott-B07421; kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org; k...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] kvm/powerpc: rename kvm_hypercall() to
epapr_hypercall
/2] kvm/powerpc: rename kvm_hypercall() to
epapr_hypercall()
On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 19:54 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 02.10.2013, at 19:49, Scott Wood wrote:
On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 19:46 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 02.10.2013, at 19:42, Scott Wood wrote:
On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 19:17
-Original Message-
From: Wood Scott-B07421
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2013 12:04 AM
To: Alexander Graf
Cc: Bhushan Bharat-R65777; kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org; k...@vger.kernel.org;
Bhushan
Bharat-R65777
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] kvm/powerpc: rename kvm_hypercall
On 23.09.2013, at 07:23, Bharat Bhushan wrote:
kvm_hypercall() have nothing KVM specific, so renamed to epapr_hypercall().
Also this in moved to arch/powerpc/include/asm/epapr_hcalls.h
Signed-off-by: Bharat Bhushan bharat.bhus...@freescale.com
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/epapr_hcalls.h |
On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 16:19 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 23.09.2013, at 07:23, Bharat Bhushan wrote:
static inline long kvm_hypercall0_1(unsigned int nr, unsigned long *r2)
@@ -65,7 +54,7 @@ static inline long kvm_hypercall0_1(unsigned int nr,
unsigned long *r2)
unsigned long
On 02.10.2013, at 18:40, Scott Wood wrote:
On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 16:19 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 23.09.2013, at 07:23, Bharat Bhushan wrote:
static inline long kvm_hypercall0_1(unsigned int nr, unsigned long *r2)
@@ -65,7 +54,7 @@ static inline long kvm_hypercall0_1(unsigned int nr,
On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 18:53 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 02.10.2013, at 18:40, Scott Wood wrote:
On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 16:19 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 23.09.2013, at 07:23, Bharat Bhushan wrote:
static inline long kvm_hypercall0_1(unsigned int nr, unsigned long *r2)
@@ -65,7
On 02.10.2013, at 19:04, Scott Wood wrote:
On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 18:53 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 02.10.2013, at 18:40, Scott Wood wrote:
On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 16:19 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 23.09.2013, at 07:23, Bharat Bhushan wrote:
static inline long
On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 19:17 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 02.10.2013, at 19:04, Scott Wood wrote:
On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 18:53 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 02.10.2013, at 18:40, Scott Wood wrote:
On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 16:19 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
Won't this break when
On 02.10.2013, at 19:42, Scott Wood wrote:
On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 19:17 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 02.10.2013, at 19:04, Scott Wood wrote:
On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 18:53 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 02.10.2013, at 18:40, Scott Wood wrote:
On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 16:19 +0200, Alexander
On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 19:46 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 02.10.2013, at 19:42, Scott Wood wrote:
On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 19:17 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 02.10.2013, at 19:04, Scott Wood wrote:
On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 18:53 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 02.10.2013, at 18:40,
On 02.10.2013, at 19:49, Scott Wood wrote:
On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 19:46 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 02.10.2013, at 19:42, Scott Wood wrote:
On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 19:17 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 02.10.2013, at 19:04, Scott Wood wrote:
On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 18:53 +0200, Alexander
On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 19:54 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 02.10.2013, at 19:49, Scott Wood wrote:
On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 19:46 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 02.10.2013, at 19:42, Scott Wood wrote:
On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 19:17 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 02.10.2013, at 19:04,
On Mon, 2013-09-23 at 10:53 +0530, Bharat Bhushan wrote:
kvm_hypercall() have nothing KVM specific, so renamed to epapr_hypercall().
Also this in moved to arch/powerpc/include/asm/epapr_hcalls.h
[snip]
+ out[0] = r4;
+ out[1] = r5;
+ out[2] = r6;
+ out[3] = r7;
+ out[4]
On Mon, 2013-09-23 at 17:45 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
On Mon, 2013-09-23 at 10:53 +0530, Bharat Bhushan wrote:
kvm_hypercall() have nothing KVM specific, so renamed to epapr_hypercall().
Also this in moved to arch/powerpc/include/asm/epapr_hcalls.h
[snip]
+ out[0] = r4;
+ out[1] = r5;
kvm_hypercall() have nothing KVM specific, so renamed to epapr_hypercall().
Also this in moved to arch/powerpc/include/asm/epapr_hcalls.h
Signed-off-by: Bharat Bhushan bharat.bhus...@freescale.com
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/epapr_hcalls.h | 36 +++
22 matches
Mail list logo
