On Sat, 2014-05-24 at 12:06 +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:29:59AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> >On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 14:37 +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
> >> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 09:10:53PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> >> >On Thu, 2014-05-22 at 18:23 +1000, Gavin Shan w
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:29:59AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
>On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 14:37 +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
>> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 09:10:53PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
>> >On Thu, 2014-05-22 at 18:23 +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
.../...
>No, sorry, I mean how does the user get info
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 02:49:13PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
.../...
>
>VFIO_EEH_RECOVER?
>
Then it should contain VFIO_EEH_PE_RESET, which is part of the
recovery. I don't expect the recovery to be done with one ioctl
command :-)
I personally prefer to keep VFIO_EEH_PE_CONFIUGRE, which mean
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:49:19AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
>On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 14:30 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> On 23.05.14 13:58, Gavin Shan wrote:
>> > On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:52:23AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> >>> Am 23.05.2014 um 05:23 schrieb Alex Williamson
>> >>> :
>>
On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 14:30 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> On 23.05.14 13:58, Gavin Shan wrote:
> > On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:52:23AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >>
> >>> Am 23.05.2014 um 05:23 schrieb Alex Williamson
> >>> :
> >>>
> On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 10:37 +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
>
On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 15:00 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 14:37 +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
> > >There's no notification, the user needs to observe the return value an
> > >poll? Should we be enabling an eventfd to notify the user of the state
> > >change?
> > >
> >
>
On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 14:37 +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 09:10:53PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> >On Thu, 2014-05-22 at 18:23 +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
> >> The patch adds new IOCTL commands for VFIO PCI device to support
> >> EEH functionality for PCI devices, which have be
On 23.05.14 14:51, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 08:52 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
Am 23.05.2014 um 05:23 schrieb Alex Williamson :
On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 10:37 +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 10:17:30AM +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 11:55:
On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 08:52 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> > Am 23.05.2014 um 05:23 schrieb Alex Williamson :
> >
> >> On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 10:37 +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
> >>> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 10:17:30AM +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 11:55:29AM +0200, Alexande
On 23.05.14 14:43, Gavin Shan wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 01:58:50PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 23.05.14 13:55, Gavin Shan wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 11:58:22AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 23.05.14 09:37, Gavin Shan wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:55:15AM +0200, Alexander G
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 01:58:50PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>On 23.05.14 13:55, Gavin Shan wrote:
>>On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 11:58:22AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>On 23.05.14 09:37, Gavin Shan wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:55:15AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>Am 23.05.2014 u
On 23.05.14 13:58, Gavin Shan wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:52:23AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
Am 23.05.2014 um 05:23 schrieb Alex Williamson :
On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 10:37 +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 10:17:30AM +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 11
On 23.05.14 13:55, Gavin Shan wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 11:58:22AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 23.05.14 09:37, Gavin Shan wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:55:15AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
Am 23.05.2014 um 06:37 schrieb Gavin Shan :
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 09:10:53PM -0600, Alex
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:52:23AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>
>> Am 23.05.2014 um 05:23 schrieb Alex Williamson :
>>
>>> On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 10:37 +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 10:17:30AM +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 11:55:29AM +0200, Alexa
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 11:58:22AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>On 23.05.14 09:37, Gavin Shan wrote:
>>On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:55:15AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
Am 23.05.2014 um 06:37 schrieb Gavin Shan :
>On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 09:10:53PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
>>On Th
On 23.05.14 09:37, Gavin Shan wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:55:15AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
Am 23.05.2014 um 06:37 schrieb Gavin Shan :
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 09:10:53PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2014-05-22 at 18:23 +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
The patch adds new IOCTL comma
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:55:15AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> Am 23.05.2014 um 06:37 schrieb Gavin Shan :
>>> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 09:10:53PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2014-05-22 at 18:23 +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
The patch adds new IOCTL commands for VFIO PCI device to
> Am 23.05.2014 um 06:37 schrieb Gavin Shan :
>
>> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 09:10:53PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2014-05-22 at 18:23 +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
>>> The patch adds new IOCTL commands for VFIO PCI device to support
>>> EEH functionality for PCI devices, which have been
> Am 23.05.2014 um 05:23 schrieb Alex Williamson :
>
>> On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 10:37 +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 10:17:30AM +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 11:55:29AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 22.05.14 10:23, Gavin Shan wrote:
>>
>> .../.
On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 14:37 +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
> >There's no notification, the user needs to observe the return value an
> >poll? Should we be enabling an eventfd to notify the user of the state
> >change?
> >
>
> Yes. The user needs to monitor the return value. we should have one
> notifi
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 09:10:53PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
>On Thu, 2014-05-22 at 18:23 +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
>> The patch adds new IOCTL commands for VFIO PCI device to support
>> EEH functionality for PCI devices, which have been passed through
>> from host to somebody else via VFIO.
>>
On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 10:37 +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 10:17:30AM +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
> >On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 11:55:29AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >>On 22.05.14 10:23, Gavin Shan wrote:
>
> .../...
>
> >>>diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h b/include/uapi/l
On Thu, 2014-05-22 at 18:23 +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
> The patch adds new IOCTL commands for VFIO PCI device to support
> EEH functionality for PCI devices, which have been passed through
> from host to somebody else via VFIO.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan
> ---
> Documentation/vfio.txt
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 10:17:30AM +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
>On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 11:55:29AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>On 22.05.14 10:23, Gavin Shan wrote:
.../...
>>>diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
>>>index cb9023d..ef55682 100644
>>>--- a/include/uapi/
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 11:55:29AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>On 22.05.14 10:23, Gavin Shan wrote:
>>The patch adds new IOCTL commands for VFIO PCI device to support
>>EEH functionality for PCI devices, which have been passed through
>>from host to somebody else via VFIO.
>>
>>Signed-off-by: G
On 22.05.14 10:23, Gavin Shan wrote:
The patch adds new IOCTL commands for VFIO PCI device to support
EEH functionality for PCI devices, which have been passed through
from host to somebody else via VFIO.
Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan
This already looks a *lot* more sane than the previous versio
The patch adds new IOCTL commands for VFIO PCI device to support
EEH functionality for PCI devices, which have been passed through
from host to somebody else via VFIO.
Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan
---
Documentation/vfio.txt | 88 ++-
arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h | 17 +++
arch/p
27 matches
Mail list logo