RE: [PATCH 0/2] kvm/e500v2: MMU optimization

2010-09-09 Thread Liu Yu-B13201
-Original Message- From: kvm-ppc-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:kvm-ppc-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Hollis Blanchard Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 12:07 AM To: Liu Yu-B13201 Cc: k...@vger.kernel.org; kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org; ag...@suse.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] kvm

Re: [PATCH 0/2] kvm/e500v2: MMU optimization

2010-09-09 Thread Hollis Blanchard
...@suse.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] kvm/e500v2: MMU optimization On 09/08/2010 02:40 AM, Liu Yu wrote: The patchset aims at mapping guest TLB1 to host TLB0. And it includes: [PATCH 1/2] kvm/e500v2: Remove shadow tlb [PATCH 2/2] kvm/e500v2: mapping guest TLB1 to host TLB0 The reason we need

RE: [PATCH 0/2] kvm/e500v2: MMU optimization

2010-09-09 Thread Liu Yu-B13201
-Original Message- From: Hollis Blanchard [mailto:hollis_blanch...@mentor.com] Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 12:23 AM To: Liu Yu-B13201 Cc: k...@vger.kernel.org; kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org; ag...@suse.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] kvm/e500v2: MMU optimization Hi

Re: [PATCH 0/2] kvm/e500v2: MMU optimization

2010-09-08 Thread Hollis Blanchard
On 09/08/2010 02:40 AM, Liu Yu wrote: The patchset aims at mapping guest TLB1 to host TLB0. And it includes: [PATCH 1/2] kvm/e500v2: Remove shadow tlb [PATCH 2/2] kvm/e500v2: mapping guest TLB1 to host TLB0 The reason we need patch 1 is because patch 1 make things simple and flexible. Only