On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 10:35:25PM +, David Woodhouse wrote:
> >
> > Could this be mitigated using pools? I don't know if the net code
> > would play along easily.
>
> For the receive side, it shouldn't be beyond the wit of man to
> introduce an API which allocates *and* DMA-maps a skb. Pass
On Sun, 2015-11-01 at 09:45 +0200, Shamir Rabinovitch wrote:
> Not sure this use case is possible for Infiniband where application hold
> the data buffers and there is no way to force application to re use the
> buffer as suggested.
>
> This is why I think there will be no easy way to bypass the
Hi Suresh,
Sorry for the noise!
Do you have a git tree that the robot can monitor and test?
In this case of one patchset depending on another, there is no chance
for the robot to do valid testing based on emailed patches.
Thanks,
Fengguang
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 10:16:06AM -0500, Suresh E. Wa
Hi Bharat,
On 6 October 2015 at 15:56, Bhushan Bharat wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Alex Williamson [mailto:alex.william...@redhat.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2015 4:25 AM
>> To: Bhushan Bharat-R65777
>> Cc: kvm...@lists.cs.columbia.edu; kvm@vger.kernel.org;
>> christo
On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 08:10:49AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> But but but ...
>
> What I don't understand is how that brings you any safety.
Limited safety maybe? If some device DMA mappings are via IOMMU
and this fall to some address range that is far from the bypass /
pass through
