As kvm_mmu_get_page() was changed so that every parent pointer would not
get into the sp->parent_ptes chain before the entry pointed to by it was
set properly, we can use the for_each_rmap_spte macro instead of
pte_list_walk().
Signed-off-by: Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa_takuya...@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.x...@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 27 ++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
index ec61b22..204c7d4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -1007,26 +1007,6 @@ static void pte_list_remove(u64 *spte, struct
kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head)
}
}
-typedef void (*pte_list_walk_fn) (u64 *spte);
-static void pte_list_walk(struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head, pte_list_walk_fn fn)
-{
- struct pte_list_desc *desc;
- int i;
-
- if (!rmap_head->val)
- return;
-
- if (!(rmap_head->val & 1))
- return fn((u64 *)rmap_head->val);
-
- desc = (struct pte_list_desc *)(rmap_head->val & ~1ul);
- while (desc) {
- for (i = 0; i < PTE_LIST_EXT && desc->sptes[i]; ++i)
- fn(desc->sptes[i]);
- desc = desc->more;
- }
-}
-
static struct kvm_rmap_head *__gfn_to_rmap(gfn_t gfn, int level,
struct kvm_memory_slot *slot)
{
@@ -1749,7 +1729,12 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_alloc_page(struct
kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int direct
static void mark_unsync(u64 *spte);
static void kvm_mmu_mark_parents_unsync(struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
{
- pte_list_walk(&sp->parent_ptes, mark_unsync);
+ u64 *sptep;
+ struct rmap_iterator iter;
+
+ for_each_rmap_spte(&sp->parent_ptes, &iter, sptep) {
+ mark_unsync(sptep);
+ }
}
static void mark_unsync(u64 *spte)
--
2.1.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
