On 22.04.2010, at 12:33, Joerg Roedel wrote:
The patch introducing nested nmi handling had a bug. The
check does not belong to enable_nmi_window but must be in
nmi_allowed. This patch fixes this.
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel joerg.roe...@amd.com
---
arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 16
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 03:46:07PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 22.04.2010, at 12:33, Joerg Roedel wrote:
The patch introducing nested nmi handling had a bug. The
check does not belong to enable_nmi_window but must be in
nmi_allowed. This patch fixes this.
Signed-off-by: Joerg
On 23.04.2010, at 16:13, Joerg Roedel wrote:
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 03:46:07PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 22.04.2010, at 12:33, Joerg Roedel wrote:
The patch introducing nested nmi handling had a bug. The
check does not belong to enable_nmi_window but must be in
nmi_allowed. This
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 04:19:40PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 23.04.2010, at 16:13, Joerg Roedel wrote:
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 03:46:07PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 22.04.2010, at 12:33, Joerg Roedel wrote:
The patch introducing nested nmi handling had a bug. The
On 23.04.2010, at 16:22, Joerg Roedel wrote:
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 04:19:40PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 23.04.2010, at 16:13, Joerg Roedel wrote:
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 03:46:07PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 22.04.2010, at 12:33, Joerg Roedel wrote:
The patch
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 04:24:54PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 23.04.2010, at 16:22, Joerg Roedel wrote:
No, nested_svm_nmi runs in atomic context where we can't emulate a
vmexit. We set exit_required and emulate the vmexit later.
So we modify the L2 rflags and then trigger a
On 23.04.2010, at 16:31, Joerg Roedel wrote:
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 04:24:54PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 23.04.2010, at 16:22, Joerg Roedel wrote:
No, nested_svm_nmi runs in atomic context where we can't emulate a
vmexit. We set exit_required and emulate the vmexit later.
So we
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 04:42:52PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 23.04.2010, at 16:31, Joerg Roedel wrote:
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 04:24:54PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 23.04.2010, at 16:22, Joerg Roedel wrote:
No, nested_svm_nmi runs in atomic context where we can't
On 23.04.2010, at 16:51, Joerg Roedel wrote:
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 04:42:52PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 23.04.2010, at 16:31, Joerg Roedel wrote:
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 04:24:54PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 23.04.2010, at 16:22, Joerg Roedel wrote:
No, nested_svm_nmi