On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 06:41:45PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Hi Andrey,
>
> just one question. Is kvm_arch_set_irq actually needed? I think
> everything should work fine without it. Can you check? If so, I can
> remove it myself and revert the patch that introduced the hook.
While Andrey
On 10/28/2015 08:41 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Hi Andrey,
just one question. Is kvm_arch_set_irq actually needed? I think
everything should work fine without it. Can you check? If so, I can
remove it myself and revert the patch that introduced the hook.
Hi Paolo,
I have checked that
On 29/10/2015 09:45, Roman Kagan wrote:
> While Andrey is testing it, I'd like to ask similar question re. MSI:
> why is there a "shortcut" for KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_MSI case (which we
> basically modelled after) when it would probably get handled through
> ->set handler in irqfd_inject() too?
Hi Andrey,
just one question. Is kvm_arch_set_irq actually needed? I think
everything should work fine without it. Can you check? If so, I can
remove it myself and revert the patch that introduced the hook.
Paolo
On 22/10/2015 18:09, Andrey Smetanin wrote:
> SynIC (synthetic interrupt
