Rusty Russell wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009 02:13:20 am Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
I out up a copy at http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Networking_Performance as
well, and intend to dump updates there from time to time.
Hi Michael,
Sorry for the delay. I'm weaning myself off my virtio
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 03:56:31 pm Dor Laor wrote:
Rusty Russell wrote:
The current theoretical hole is that the host suppresses notifications
using the VIRTIO_AVAIL_F_NO_NOTIFY flag, but we can get a number of
notifications in before it gets to that suppression. You can use a
counter to
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 12:09:33AM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 03:56:31 pm Dor Laor wrote:
Rusty Russell wrote:
The current theoretical hole is that the host suppresses notifications
using the VIRTIO_AVAIL_F_NO_NOTIFY flag, but we can get a number of
notifications
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
But I don't understand how aio will make implementing it easier -
or are you merely saying that it will make it worthwhile?
If you have aio, the the NIC and the guest proceed in parallel. If the
guest is faster (likely), then when it sends the next packet it will
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 06:18:01PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
But I don't understand how aio will make implementing it easier -
or are you merely saying that it will make it worthwhile?
If you have aio, the the NIC and the guest proceed in parallel. If the
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 06:18:01PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
But I don't understand how aio will make implementing it easier -
or are you merely saying that it will make it worthwhile?
If you have aio, the the NIC and the
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 07:08:49PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 06:18:01PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
But I don't understand how aio will make implementing it easier -
or are you merely saying that it will make it
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009 02:13:20 am Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
I out up a copy at http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Networking_Performance as
well, and intend to dump updates there from time to time.
Hi Michael,
Sorry for the delay. I'm weaning myself off my virtio work, but virtio_net
performance
As I'm new to qemu/kvm, to figure out how networking performance can be
improved, I
went over the code and took some notes. As I did this, I tried to record ideas
from recent discussions and ideas that came up on improving performance. Thus
this list.
This includes a partial overview of
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
As I'm new to qemu/kvm, to figure out how networking performance can be
improved, I
went over the code and took some notes. As I did this, I tried to record
ideas
from recent discussions and ideas that came up on improving performance. Thus
this list.
This
On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 01:16:05PM -0400, Gregory Haskins wrote:
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
As I'm new to qemu/kvm, to figure out how networking performance can be
improved, I
went over the code and took some notes. As I did this, I tried to record
ideas
from recent discussions and
On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 01:50:20PM -0400, Gregory Haskins wrote:
Suit yourself, but I suspect that by the time you build the prototype
you will either end up re-solving all the same problems anyway, or have
diminished functionality (or both).
/me goes to look at vbus patches.
--
MST
--
To
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 01:16:05PM -0400, Gregory Haskins wrote:
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
As I'm new to qemu/kvm, to figure out how networking performance can be
improved, I
went over the code and took some notes. As I did this, I tried to record
ideas
13 matches
Mail list logo
