On 6/21/19 10:38 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> From: Christoffer Dall
>
> Add stage 2 mmu data structures for virtual EL2 and for nested guests.
> We don't yet populate shadow stage 2 page tables, but we now have a
> framework for getting to a shadow stage 2 pgd.
>
> We allocate twice the number of
On 27/06/2019 10:21, Alexandru Elisei wrote:
> On 6/21/19 10:37 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> Extract the direct HW accessors for later reuse.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 247 +-
>> 1 file changed, 139 insertions(+),
On 26/06/2019 16:04, Alexandru Elisei wrote:
> On 6/21/19 10:37 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> From: Andre Przywara
>>
>> KVM internally uses accessor functions when reading or writing the
>> guest's system registers. This takes care of accessing either the stored
>> copy or using the "live" EL1
On 26/06/2019 07:55, Julien Thierry wrote:
>
>
> On 06/21/2019 10:38 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> From: Jintack Lim
>>
>> Forward the EL1 virtual memory register traps to the virtual EL2 if they
>> are not coming from the virtual EL2 and the virtual HCR_EL2.TVM or TRVM
>> bit is set.
>>
>> This
Hi Julien,
On 20/06/2019 14:06, Julien Grall wrote:
> We will want to re-use the ASID allocator in a separate context (e.g
> allocating VMID). So move the code in a new file.
>
> The function asid_check_context has been moved in the header as a static
> inline function because we want to avoid
On 03/07/2019 17:32, Alexandru Elisei wrote:
[...]
+}
+
+#define EL2_SYSREG(el2, el1, translate) \
+ [el2 - FIRST_EL2_SYSREG] = { el2, el1, translate }
+#define PURE_EL2_SYSREG(el2) \
+ [el2 - FIRST_EL2_SYSREG] = { el2,__INVALID_SYSREG__, NULL }
+/*
+
On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 02:24:42PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 04/07/19 10:20, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > +KVM, Paolo and Radim,
> >
> > Guys, do you mind picking this single patch and sending it to Linus?
> > That's the only fix left for 5.2. Alternatively, I can send you a pull
> > request,
On 04/07/19 10:20, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> +KVM, Paolo and Radim,
>
> Guys, do you mind picking this single patch and sending it to Linus?
> That's the only fix left for 5.2. Alternatively, I can send you a pull
> request, but it feels overkill.
Sure, will do.
Paolo
> Either way, please let me
On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 10:04:08AM +, Zhang, Lei wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I have started up KVM guest os successfully with SVE feature with Dave' patch.
>
> Tested-by: Zhang Lei
Thanks for verifying.
It's really your fix, I only wrote a commit message for it :)
[...]
Cheers
---Dave
Hi guys,
I have started up KVM guest os successfully with SVE feature with Dave' patch.
Tested-by: Zhang Lei
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Martin
> Sent: Thursday, July 04, 2019 5:35 PM
> To: Viresh Kumar
> Cc: Okamoto, Takayuki/岡本 高幸 ; Christoffer
> Dall ; Ard Biesheuvel ; Marc
On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 10:21:57AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 24/06/2019 13:48, Dave Martin wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 02:50:08PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> >> On 21/06/2019 14:24, Julien Thierry wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 21/06/2019 10:37, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> From:
On 04/07/2019 10:01, Andre Przywara wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Jul 2019 08:38:20 +0100
> Julien Thierry wrote:
>
>> On 21/06/2019 10:38, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>> From: Andre Przywara
>>>
>>> The VGIC maintenance IRQ signals various conditions about the LRs, when
>>> the GIC's virtualization extension
On Thu, 4 Jul 2019 08:38:20 +0100
Julien Thierry wrote:
> On 21/06/2019 10:38, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > From: Andre Przywara
> >
> > The VGIC maintenance IRQ signals various conditions about the LRs, when
> > the GIC's virtualization extension is used.
> > So far we didn't need it, but nested
On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 08:32:52AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 03-07-19, 18:42, Dave Martin wrote:
> > From: Zhang Lei
> >
> > The original implementation of vq_present() relied on aggressive
> > inlining in order for the compiler to know that the code is
> > correct, due to some
+KVM, Paolo and Radim,
Guys, do you mind picking this single patch and sending it to Linus?
That's the only fix left for 5.2. Alternatively, I can send you a pull
request, but it feels overkill.
Either way, please let me know.
Thanks,
M.
On Wed, 03 Jul 2019 18:42:50 +0100,
Dave Martin
On 21/06/2019 10:38, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> When we take a maintenance interrupt, we need to decide whether
> it is generated on an action from the guest, or if it is something
> that needs to be forwarded to the guest hypervisor.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier
> ---
>
On 21/06/2019 10:38, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> From: Andre Przywara
>
> The VGIC maintenance IRQ signals various conditions about the LRs, when
> the GIC's virtualization extension is used.
> So far we didn't need it, but nested virtualization needs to know about
> this interrupt, so add a
17 matches
Mail list logo
