Hi Alex,
On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 1:43 PM Alexandru Elisei
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 6/8/21 3:11 PM, Fuad Tabba wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This patch series adds support for restricting CPU features for protected
> > VMs
> > in KVM [1].
> >
> > Various feature configurations are allowed in KVM/arm64.
Hi,
On 6/8/21 3:11 PM, Fuad Tabba wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patch series adds support for restricting CPU features for protected VMs
> in KVM [1].
>
> Various feature configurations are allowed in KVM/arm64. Supporting all
> these features in pKVM is difficult, as it either involves moving much of
>
Hi Drew,
> I see this series takes the approach we currently have in KVM of masking
> features we don't want to expose to the guest. This approach adds yet
> another "reject list" to be maintained as hardware evolves. I'd rather see
> that we first change KVM to using an accept list, i.e. mask
Hi,
This patch series adds support for restricting CPU features for protected VMs
in KVM [1].
Various feature configurations are allowed in KVM/arm64. Supporting all
these features in pKVM is difficult, as it either involves moving much of
the handling code to EL2, which adds bloat and results
On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 03:11:28PM +0100, Fuad Tabba wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patch series adds support for restricting CPU features for protected VMs
> in KVM [1].
>
> Various feature configurations are allowed in KVM/arm64. Supporting all
> these features in pKVM is difficult, as it either
