Re: [PATCH v2] ARM/arm64: KVM: test properly for a PTE's uncachedness

2015-11-10 Thread Ard Biesheuvel
(adding lists) On 10 November 2015 at 10:45, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > Hi all, > > I wonder if this is a better way to address the problem. It looks at > the nature of the memory rather than the nature of the mapping, which > is probably a more reliable indicator of

RE: [PATCH v2] ARM/arm64: KVM: test properly for a PTE's uncachedness

2015-11-10 Thread Pavel Fedin
2:48 PM > To: Christoffer Dall; Marc Zyngier; KVM devel mailing list; > kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu > Cc: p.fe...@samsung.com; Ard Biesheuvel > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM/arm64: KVM: test properly for a PTE's uncachedness > > (adding lists) > > On 10 November 2015 at

Re: [PATCH v2] ARM/arm64: KVM: test properly for a PTE's uncachedness

2015-11-10 Thread Ard Biesheuvel
On 10 November 2015 at 13:22, Christoffer Dall wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 10:45:37AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I wonder if this is a better way to address the problem. It looks at >> the nature of the memory rather than the nature of the

Re: [PATCH v2] ARM/arm64: KVM: test properly for a PTE's uncachedness

2015-11-10 Thread Christoffer Dall
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 02:15:45PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > On 10 November 2015 at 13:22, Christoffer Dall > wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 10:45:37AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I wonder if this is a better way to address the

Re: [PATCH v2] ARM/arm64: KVM: test properly for a PTE's uncachedness

2015-11-10 Thread Ard Biesheuvel
On 10 November 2015 at 14:40, Christoffer Dall wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 02:15:45PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: >> On 10 November 2015 at 13:22, Christoffer Dall >> wrote: >> > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 10:45:37AM +0100, Ard