(adding lists)
On 10 November 2015 at 10:45, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I wonder if this is a better way to address the problem. It looks at
> the nature of the memory rather than the nature of the mapping, which
> is probably a more reliable indicator of
2:48 PM
> To: Christoffer Dall; Marc Zyngier; KVM devel mailing list;
> kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
> Cc: p.fe...@samsung.com; Ard Biesheuvel
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM/arm64: KVM: test properly for a PTE's uncachedness
>
> (adding lists)
>
> On 10 November 2015 at
On 10 November 2015 at 13:22, Christoffer Dall
wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 10:45:37AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I wonder if this is a better way to address the problem. It looks at
>> the nature of the memory rather than the nature of the
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 02:15:45PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 10 November 2015 at 13:22, Christoffer Dall
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 10:45:37AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I wonder if this is a better way to address the
On 10 November 2015 at 14:40, Christoffer Dall
wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 02:15:45PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> On 10 November 2015 at 13:22, Christoffer Dall
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 10:45:37AM +0100, Ard