On Tue, 27 Sep 2022 15:43:10 -0400,
Oliver Upton wrote:
>
> Hi Marc,
>
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 07:34:22AM -0400, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> > > index c9a13e487187..5d05bb92e129 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> >
Hi Marc,
On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 07:34:22AM -0400, Marc Zyngier wrote:
[...]
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> > index c9a13e487187..5d05bb92e129 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> > @@ -31,6 +31,12 @@ static phys_addr_t
On Mon, 26 Sep 2022 18:21:45 -0400,
Oliver Upton wrote:
>
> Presently stage2_apply_range() works on a batch of memory addressed by a
> stage 2 root table entry for the VM. Depending on the IPA limit of the
> VM and PAGE_SIZE of the host, this could address a massive range of
> memory. Some
Presently stage2_apply_range() works on a batch of memory addressed by a
stage 2 root table entry for the VM. Depending on the IPA limit of the
VM and PAGE_SIZE of the host, this could address a massive range of
memory. Some examples:
4 level, 4K paging -> 512 GB batch size
3 level, 64K
