Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] arm64: Support systems without FP/ASIMD

2016-11-16 Thread Catalin Marinas
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 01:56:19PM +, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote: > This series adds supports to the kernel and KVM hyp to handle > systems without FP/ASIMD properly. At the moment the kernel > doesn't check if the FP unit is available before accessing > the registers (e.g during context switch).

Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] arm64: Support systems without FP/ASIMD

2016-11-14 Thread Catalin Marinas
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 01:41:37PM +, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On 08/11/16 13:56, Suzuki K Poulose wrote: > > This series adds supports to the kernel and KVM hyp to handle > > systems without FP/ASIMD properly. At the moment the kernel > > doesn't check if the FP unit is available before accessing

Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] arm64: Support systems without FP/ASIMD

2016-11-11 Thread Marc Zyngier
On 08/11/16 13:56, Suzuki K Poulose wrote: > This series adds supports to the kernel and KVM hyp to handle > systems without FP/ASIMD properly. At the moment the kernel > doesn't check if the FP unit is available before accessing > the registers (e.g during context switch). Also for KVM, > we trap

[PATCH v3 0/2] arm64: Support systems without FP/ASIMD

2016-11-08 Thread Suzuki K Poulose
This series adds supports to the kernel and KVM hyp to handle systems without FP/ASIMD properly. At the moment the kernel doesn't check if the FP unit is available before accessing the registers (e.g during context switch). Also for KVM, we trap the FP/ASIMD accesses and handle it by injecting an u