Re: [PATCH v3 27/55] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-new: Add PRIORITY registers handlers

On 12 May 2016 at 10:10, Marc Zyngier wrote: > This is wrong. We should only write the number of bits of priority we > actually emulate. And given that we use a common framework for v2 and > v3, this should probably be 5 bits (32 priorities should be enough for > everybody).

Re: [PATCH v3 27/55] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-new: Add PRIORITY registers handlers

On 06/05/16 11:45, Andre Przywara wrote: > The priority register handlers are shared between the v2 and v3 > emulation, so their implementation goes into vgic-mmio.c, to be > easily referenced from the v3 emulation as well later. > There is a corner case when we change the priority of a pending >

Re: [PATCH v3 27/55] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-new: Add PRIORITY registers handlers

On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 11:45:40AM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote: > The priority register handlers are shared between the v2 and v3 > emulation, so their implementation goes into vgic-mmio.c, to be > easily referenced from the v3 emulation as well later. > There is a corner case when we change the

[PATCH v3 27/55] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-new: Add PRIORITY registers handlers

The priority register handlers are shared between the v2 and v3 emulation, so their implementation goes into vgic-mmio.c, to be easily referenced from the v3 emulation as well later. There is a corner case when we change the priority of a pending interrupt which we don't handle at the moment.