On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 06:26:39PM +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Feb 2018 21:03:26 +,
> Christoffer Dall wrote:
> >
> > To make the code more readable and to avoid the overhead of a function
> > call, let's get rid of a pair of the alternative function selectors and
> > explicitly ca
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 10:03:26PM +0100, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> To make the code more readable and to avoid the overhead of a function
> call, let's get rid of a pair of the alternative function selectors and
> explicitly call the VHE and non-VHE functions using the has_vhe() static
> key based
On Thu, 15 Feb 2018 21:03:26 +,
Christoffer Dall wrote:
>
> To make the code more readable and to avoid the overhead of a function
> call, let's get rid of a pair of the alternative function selectors and
> explicitly call the VHE and non-VHE functions using the has_vhe() static
> key based se
To make the code more readable and to avoid the overhead of a function
call, let's get rid of a pair of the alternative function selectors and
explicitly call the VHE and non-VHE functions using the has_vhe() static
key based selector instead, telling the compiler to try to inline the
static functi
