On 17 March 2015 at 19:04, Christoffer Dall christoffer.d...@linaro.org wrote:
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 04:18:16PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
Note that this code is implicitly relying on the
ordering of register banks defined by the bank_number()
function, which is a bit icky.
right, I
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 04:18:16PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 16 March 2015 at 11:01, Alex Bennée alex.ben...@linaro.org wrote:
From: Christoffer Dall christoffer.d...@linaro.org
The current code was negatively indexing the cpu state array and not
synchronizing banked spsr register
From: Christoffer Dall christoffer.d...@linaro.org
The current code was negatively indexing the cpu state array and not
synchronizing banked spsr register state with the current mode's spsr
state, causing occasional failures with migration.
Some munging is done to take care of the aarch64
