On 05/02/16 09:23, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 06:51:06PM +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> Hi Drew,
>>
>> On 04/02/16 18:38, Andrew Jones wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Marc and Andre,
>>>
>>> I completely understand why reset_mpidr() limits Aff0 to 16, thanks
>>> to Andre's nice comment about
On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 10:23:53AM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 06:51:06PM +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> What would the benefit of defining a "socket"?
>
> That's a good lead in for my next question. While I don't believe
> there needs to be any relationship between socket
On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 10:37:42AM +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 05/02/16 09:23, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 06:51:06PM +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> >> Hi Drew,
> >>
> >> On 04/02/16 18:38, Andrew Jones wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Marc and Andre,
> >>>
> >>> I completely understand
On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 11:00:33AM +, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 10:23:53AM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 06:51:06PM +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > What would the benefit of defining a "socket"?
> >
> > That's a good lead in for my next question.
On 05/02/16 12:03, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 10:37:42AM +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On 05/02/16 09:23, Andrew Jones wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 06:51:06PM +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
Hi Drew,
On 04/02/16 18:38, Andrew Jones wrote:
>
> Hi Marc and
Hi Drew,
On 04/02/16 18:38, Andrew Jones wrote:
>
> Hi Marc and Andre,
>
> I completely understand why reset_mpidr() limits Aff0 to 16, thanks
> to Andre's nice comment about ICC_SGIxR. Now, here's my question;
> it seems that the Cortex-A{53,57,72} manuals want to further limit
> Aff0 to 4,
