Hi Paolo and Marc,
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 06:20:15PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 18/03/2015 08:55, Christoffer Dall wrote:
Hi Stephen,
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 02:41:11PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the kvm-arm tree got a conflict in
On 16/04/2015 21:10, Christoffer Dall wrote:
As it turns out, it was not the same logic as Stephen's resolution.
Stephen's resolution is bussy, because vlr is passed by value to
vgic_queue_irq_to_lr() and therefore the call to sync the elrsr does not
have any effect.
Unfortunately, it
On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 09:15:13AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On Tue, 7 Apr 2015 17:20:15 +0100
Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi Paolo,
On 18/03/2015 08:55, Christoffer Dall wrote:
Hi Stephen,
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 02:41:11PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi
On Tue, 7 Apr 2015 17:20:15 +0100
Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi Paolo,
On 18/03/2015 08:55, Christoffer Dall wrote:
Hi Stephen,
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 02:41:11PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the kvm-arm tree got a conflict in
On 18/03/2015 08:55, Christoffer Dall wrote:
Hi Stephen,
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 02:41:11PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the kvm-arm tree got a conflict in
virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c between commit ae705930fca6 (arm/arm64: KVM: Keep
elrsr/aisr in sync with
Hi Stephen,
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 02:41:11PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the kvm-arm tree got a conflict in
virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c between commit ae705930fca6 (arm/arm64: KVM: Keep
elrsr/aisr in sync with software model) from Linus' tree and commit
