On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 05:01:22PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> We don't document our ELF hwcaps, leaving developers to interpret them
> according to hearsay, guesswork, or (in exceptional cases) inspection of
> the current kernel code.
>
> This is less than optimal, and it would be far better if
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 05:01:21PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> This series adds support for the ARMv8.3 pointer authentication extension.
>
> Since RFC [1]:
> * Make the KVM context switch (semi-lazy)
> * Rebase to v4.13-rc1
> * Improve pointer authentication documentation
> * Add hwcap documenta
Hi Wanghaibin,
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 06:23:28PM +0800, wanghaibin wrote:
> v2: Split the patch again to make it easier for review
> some fixes were proposed by Marc
>
> v1: the problem describe:
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/pipermail/kvmarm/2017-July/026295.html
please also include the
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 02:52:40PM +0200, Eric Auger wrote:
> This patch selects IRQ_BYPASS_MANAGER and HAVE_KVM_IRQ_BYPASS
> configs for ARM/ARM64.
>
> kvm_arch_has_irq_bypass() now is implemented and returns true.
> As a consequence the irq bypass consumer will be registered for
> ARM/ARM64 with
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 02:52:38PM +0200, Eric Auger wrote:
> Implements kvm_vgic_[set|unset]_forwarding.
>
> Handle low-level VGIC programming and consistent irqchip
> programming.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger
>
> ---
>
> v1 -> v2:
> - change the parameter names used in the declaration
> - u
On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 09:41:42AM +0200, Auger Eric wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
> On 04/07/2017 14:15, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > Hi Eric,
> >
> > On 15/06/17 13:52, Eric Auger wrote:
> >> Currently, the line level of unmapped level sensitive SPIs is
> >> toggled down by the maintenance IRQ handler/resampl
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 02:52:37PM +0200, Eric Auger wrote:
> Currently, the line level of unmapped level sensitive SPIs is
> toggled down by the maintenance IRQ handler/resamplefd mechanism.
>
> As mapped SPI completion is not trapped, we cannot rely on this
> mechanism and the line level needs t
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 02:52:36PM +0200, Eric Auger wrote:
> We want to reuse the core of the map/unmap functions for IRQ
> forwarding. Let's move the computation of the hwirq in
> kvm_vgic_map_phys_irq and pass the linux IRQ as parameter.
> the host_irq is added to struct vgic_irq.
>
> We introd
