Hi Andre,
On 04/08/2016 12:17, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On 04/08/16 11:11, Auger Eric wrote:
>> Hi Andre,
>>
>> On 03/08/2016 16:57, Andre Przywara wrote:
>>> Currently we register ITS devices upon userland issuing the CTRL_INIT
>>> ioctl to mark initialization of the ITS as done.
Hi Eric,
On 04/08/16 11:11, Auger Eric wrote:
> Hi Andre,
>
> On 03/08/2016 16:57, Andre Przywara wrote:
>> Currently we register ITS devices upon userland issuing the CTRL_INIT
>> ioctl to mark initialization of the ITS as done.
>> This deviates from the initialization sequence of the existing
Hi Andre,
On 03/08/2016 16:57, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Currently we register ITS devices upon userland issuing the CTRL_INIT
> ioctl to mark initialization of the ITS as done.
> This deviates from the initialization sequence of the existing GIC
> devices and does not play well with the way QEMU
On 03/08/2016 19:56, Auger Eric wrote:
> Hi
>
> On 03/08/2016 19:48, Auger Eric wrote:
>> Hi Andre, Christoffer,
>>
>> On 03/08/2016 19:18, Andre Przywara wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 03/08/16 18:11, Christoffer Dall wrote:
On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 03:57:45PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
>
Hi Andre,
[auto build test ERROR on kvmarm/next]
[also build test ERROR on next-20160803]
[cannot apply to v4.7]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
Hi
On 03/08/2016 19:48, Auger Eric wrote:
> Hi Andre, Christoffer,
>
> On 03/08/2016 19:18, Andre Przywara wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 03/08/16 18:11, Christoffer Dall wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 03:57:45PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
Currently we register ITS devices upon userland
On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 07:48:15PM +0200, Auger Eric wrote:
> Hi Andre, Christoffer,
>
> On 03/08/2016 19:18, Andre Przywara wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 03/08/16 18:11, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> >> On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 03:57:45PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
> >>> Currently we register ITS
Hi Andre, Christoffer,
On 03/08/2016 19:18, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 03/08/16 18:11, Christoffer Dall wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 03:57:45PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
>>> Currently we register ITS devices upon userland issuing the CTRL_INIT
>>> ioctl to mark initialization of
On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 06:18:48PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 03/08/16 18:11, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 03:57:45PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
> >> Currently we register ITS devices upon userland issuing the CTRL_INIT
> >> ioctl to mark initialization of
Hi,
On 03/08/16 18:11, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 03:57:45PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
>> Currently we register ITS devices upon userland issuing the CTRL_INIT
>> ioctl to mark initialization of the ITS as done.
>> This deviates from the initialization sequence of the
On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 03:57:45PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Currently we register ITS devices upon userland issuing the CTRL_INIT
> ioctl to mark initialization of the ITS as done.
> This deviates from the initialization sequence of the existing GIC
> devices and does not play well with the
On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 03:57:45PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Currently we register ITS devices upon userland issuing the CTRL_INIT
> ioctl to mark initialization of the ITS as done.
> This deviates from the initialization sequence of the existing GIC
> devices and does not play well with the
Currently we register ITS devices upon userland issuing the CTRL_INIT
ioctl to mark initialization of the ITS as done.
This deviates from the initialization sequence of the existing GIC
devices and does not play well with the way QEMU handles things.
To be more in line with what we are used to,
13 matches
Mail list logo
