the discussion on the generic cpu seems to be stuck, is there a possibility to
take this patch. so that Thunder has a chance to run some KVM.
Thanks,
Tirumalesh.
> On Jun 29, 2015, at 10:11 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>
> On 29/06/15 18:06, Chalamarla, Tirumalesh wrote:
>>
>>> On Jun 29, 2015, a
On 29 June 2015 at 18:11, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 29/06/15 18:06, Chalamarla, Tirumalesh wrote:
>>
>>> On Jun 29, 2015, at 1:53 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>> Constantly adding new CPUs without providing any insight as to how they
>>> should be emulated only brings churn, and not much benefit.
>>>
On 29/06/15 18:06, Chalamarla, Tirumalesh wrote:
>
>> On Jun 29, 2015, at 1:53 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>
>> On 26/06/15 20:51, Tirumalesh Chalamarla wrote:
>>> In order to allow KVM to run on Thunder implementations, add the
>>> minimal support required.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tirumalesh Chalama
> On Jun 29, 2015, at 1:53 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>
> On 26/06/15 20:51, Tirumalesh Chalamarla wrote:
>> In order to allow KVM to run on Thunder implementations, add the
>> minimal support required.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tirumalesh Chalamarla
>
> CCing the KVM/ARM maintainers should be the fi
On 26/06/15 20:51, Tirumalesh Chalamarla wrote:
> In order to allow KVM to run on Thunder implementations, add the
> minimal support required.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tirumalesh Chalamarla
CCing the KVM/ARM maintainers should be the first course of action.
Also, you may want to try Suzuki's patch in
In order to allow KVM to run on Thunder implementations, add the
minimal support required.
Signed-off-by: Tirumalesh Chalamarla
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h | 3 +++
arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h| 3 ++-
arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c | 6 ++
arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs
