Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: kvm: Use has_vhe() instead of hyp_alternate_select()

Hi Shanker, On Sun, Mar 05, 2017 at 08:33:18PM -0600, Shanker Donthineni wrote: > Now all the cpu_hwcaps features have their own static keys. We don't > need a separate function hyp_alternate_select() to patch the vhe/nvhe > code. We can achieve the same functionality by using has_vhe(). It > impr

Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: kvm: Use has_vhe() instead of hyp_alternate_select()

Hi Marc, On 03/06/2017 02:34 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote: Hi Shanker, On Mon, Mar 06 2017 at 2:33:18 am GMT, Shanker Donthineni wrote: Now all the cpu_hwcaps features have their own static keys. We don't need a separate function hyp_alternate_select() to patch the vhe/nvhe code. We can achieve

Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: kvm: Use has_vhe() instead of hyp_alternate_select()

Hi Shanker, On Mon, Mar 06 2017 at 2:33:18 am GMT, Shanker Donthineni wrote: > Now all the cpu_hwcaps features have their own static keys. We don't > need a separate function hyp_alternate_select() to patch the vhe/nvhe > code. We can achieve the same functionality by using has_vhe(). It > impr

[PATCH v2] arm64: kvm: Use has_vhe() instead of hyp_alternate_select()

Now all the cpu_hwcaps features have their own static keys. We don't need a separate function hyp_alternate_select() to patch the vhe/nvhe code. We can achieve the same functionality by using has_vhe(). It improves the code readability, uses the jump label instructions, and also compiler generates