Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] KVM: arm/arm64: Support VGIC dist pend/active changes for mapped IRQs

2017-09-08 Thread Marc Zyngier
On 08/09/17 17:05, Christoffer Dall wrote: > On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Auger Eric wrote: >> Hi Marc, >> >> On 08/09/2017 15:32, Marc Zyngier wrote: >>> On 08/09/17 14:04, Auger Eric wrote: Hi Christoffer, On 06/09/2017 14:26, Christoffer Dall wrote:

Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] KVM: arm/arm64: Support VGIC dist pend/active changes for mapped IRQs

2017-09-08 Thread Christoffer Dall
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Auger Eric wrote: > Hi Marc, > > On 08/09/2017 15:32, Marc Zyngier wrote: >> On 08/09/17 14:04, Auger Eric wrote: >>> Hi Christoffer, >>> >>> On 06/09/2017 14:26, Christoffer Dall wrote: For mapped IRQs (with the HW bit set in the LR) we

Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] KVM: arm/arm64: Support VGIC dist pend/active changes for mapped IRQs

2017-09-08 Thread Auger Eric
Hi Marc, On 08/09/2017 15:32, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On 08/09/17 14:04, Auger Eric wrote: >> Hi Christoffer, >> >> On 06/09/2017 14:26, Christoffer Dall wrote: >>> For mapped IRQs (with the HW bit set in the LR) we have to follow some >>> rules of the architecture. One of these rules is that VM

Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] KVM: arm/arm64: Support VGIC dist pend/active changes for mapped IRQs

2017-09-08 Thread Marc Zyngier
On 08/09/17 14:04, Auger Eric wrote: > Hi Christoffer, > > On 06/09/2017 14:26, Christoffer Dall wrote: >> For mapped IRQs (with the HW bit set in the LR) we have to follow some >> rules of the architecture. One of these rules is that VM must not be >> allowed to deactivate a virtual interrupt

Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] KVM: arm/arm64: Support VGIC dist pend/active changes for mapped IRQs

2017-09-08 Thread Auger Eric
Hi Christoffer, On 06/09/2017 14:26, Christoffer Dall wrote: > For mapped IRQs (with the HW bit set in the LR) we have to follow some > rules of the architecture. One of these rules is that VM must not be > allowed to deactivate a virtual interrupt with the HW bit set unless the > physical