On 18/01/18 20:28, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 06:43:32PM +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> As we're moving towards a much more dynamic way to compute our
>> HYP VA, let's express the mask in a slightly different way.
>>
>> Instead of comparing the idmap position to the "low" VA
On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 06:43:32PM +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> As we're moving towards a much more dynamic way to compute our
> HYP VA, let's express the mask in a slightly different way.
>
> Instead of comparing the idmap position to the "low" VA mask,
> we directly compute the mask by taking
As we're moving towards a much more dynamic way to compute our
HYP VA, let's express the mask in a slightly different way.
Instead of comparing the idmap position to the "low" VA mask,
we directly compute the mask by taking into account the idmap's
(VA_BIT-1) bit.
No functionnal change.
