On 5 July 2016 at 09:59, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Ah, OK, so you _do_ the address setup _after_ the INIT.
> My understanding of the KVM API was that this isn't allowed, as with the
> INIT _everything_ should have been setup. kvmtool works this way.
>
> So we obviously can't
On 05/07/2016 10:59, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> thank you very much for the elaborate explanation!
>
> On 05/07/16 08:40, Auger Eric wrote:
>> Hi Andre,
>> On 04/07/2016 19:40, Andre Przywara wrote:
>>> Hi Eric,
>>>
>>> On 04/07/16 16:00, Auger Eric wrote:
Hi Peter,
On
Hi Eric,
thank you very much for the elaborate explanation!
On 05/07/16 08:40, Auger Eric wrote:
> Hi Andre,
> On 04/07/2016 19:40, Andre Przywara wrote:
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> On 04/07/16 16:00, Auger Eric wrote:
>>> Hi Peter,
>>>
>>> On 04/07/2016 16:32, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 4 July 2016 at
Hi Andre,
On 04/07/2016 19:40, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On 04/07/16 16:00, Auger Eric wrote:
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>> On 04/07/2016 16:32, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> On 4 July 2016 at 15:27, Auger Eric wrote:
Andre,
On 04/07/2016 16:05, Andre Przywara
Hi Andre,
On 04/07/2016 19:40, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On 04/07/16 16:00, Auger Eric wrote:
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>> On 04/07/2016 16:32, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> On 4 July 2016 at 15:27, Auger Eric wrote:
Andre,
On 04/07/2016 16:05, Andre Przywara
Hi Eric,
On 04/07/16 16:00, Auger Eric wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> On 04/07/2016 16:32, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 4 July 2016 at 15:27, Auger Eric wrote:
>>> Andre,
>>>
>>> On 04/07/2016 16:05, Andre Przywara wrote:
Hi,
On 04/07/16 10:00, Auger Eric wrote:
Hi Peter,
On 04/07/2016 16:32, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 4 July 2016 at 15:27, Auger Eric wrote:
>> Andre,
>>
>> On 04/07/2016 16:05, Andre Przywara wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 04/07/16 10:00, Auger Eric wrote:
From a QEMU integration point of view this means the init
On 4 July 2016 at 15:27, Auger Eric wrote:
> Andre,
>
> On 04/07/2016 16:05, Andre Przywara wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 04/07/16 10:00, Auger Eric wrote:
>>> From a QEMU integration point of view this means the init sequence used
>>> for KVM GIC interrupt controllers cannot be
Andre,
On 04/07/2016 16:05, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 04/07/16 10:00, Auger Eric wrote:
>> Hi Andre,
>>
>> On 28/06/2016 14:32, Andre Przywara wrote:
>>> Introduce a new KVM device that represents an ARM Interrupt Translation
>>> Service (ITS) controller. Since there can be multiple of
Hi,
On 04/07/16 10:00, Auger Eric wrote:
> Hi Andre,
>
> On 28/06/2016 14:32, Andre Przywara wrote:
>> Introduce a new KVM device that represents an ARM Interrupt Translation
>> Service (ITS) controller. Since there can be multiple of this per guest,
>> we can't piggy back on the existing GICv3
10 matches
Mail list logo