Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 2/3] arm: pmu: Reset the pmu registers before starting some tests

2022-08-11 Thread Andrew Jones
On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 04:33:26PM -0700, Ricardo Koller wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 09:02:16PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 04, 2022 at 05:41:38PM -0700, Ricardo Koller wrote:
> > > Some registers like the PMOVS reset to an architecturally UNKNOWN value.
> > > Most tests expect them to be reset (mostly zeroed) using pmu_reset().
> > > Add a pmu_reset() on all the tests that need one.
> > > 
> > > As a bonus, fix a couple of comments related to the register state
> > > before a sub-test.
> > > 
> > > Reviewed-by: Eric Auger 
> > > Signed-off-by: Ricardo Koller 
> > > ---
> > >  arm/pmu.c | 6 --
> > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/arm/pmu.c b/arm/pmu.c
> > > index 4c601b05..12e7d84e 100644
> > > --- a/arm/pmu.c
> > > +++ b/arm/pmu.c
> > > @@ -826,7 +826,7 @@ static void test_overflow_interrupt(void)
> > >   write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 1, PRE_OVERFLOW);
> > >   isb();
> > >  
> > > - /* interrupts are disabled */
> > > + /* interrupts are disabled (PMINTENSET_EL1 == 0) */
> > >  
> > >   mem_access_loop(addr, 200, pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E);
> > >   report(expect_interrupts(0), "no overflow interrupt after preset");
> > > @@ -842,7 +842,7 @@ static void test_overflow_interrupt(void)
> > >   isb();
> > >   report(expect_interrupts(0), "no overflow interrupt after counting");
> > >  
> > > - /* enable interrupts */
> > > + /* enable interrupts (PMINTENSET_EL1 <= ALL_SET) */
> > >  
> > >   pmu_reset_stats();
> > >  
> > > @@ -890,6 +890,7 @@ static bool check_cycles_increase(void)
> > >   bool success = true;
> > >  
> > >   /* init before event access, this test only cares about cycle count */
> > > + pmu_reset();
> > 
> > This and the other pmu_reset() call below break compilation on 32-bit arm,
> > because there's no pmu_reset() defined for it.
> I completely missed the 32-bit arm case. Thanks!
> 
> > It'd probably be best if
> > we actually implemented some sort of reset for arm, considering it's being
> > called in common tests.
> 
> Mind if I start by creating a pmu_reset() for 32-bit arm, which can
> later be used by a general arm_reset()?

No need to worry about a general one. We just need a pmu_reset implemented
for 32-bit arm up in its #ifdef __arm__ section.

Thanks,
drew

> 
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > drew
> > 
> > >   set_pmcntenset(1 << PMU_CYCLE_IDX);
> > >   set_pmccfiltr(0); /* count cycles in EL0, EL1, but not EL2 */
> > >  
> > > @@ -944,6 +945,7 @@ static bool check_cpi(int cpi)
> > >   uint32_t pmcr = get_pmcr() | PMU_PMCR_LC | PMU_PMCR_C | PMU_PMCR_E;
> > >  
> > >   /* init before event access, this test only cares about cycle count */
> > > + pmu_reset();
> > >   set_pmcntenset(1 << PMU_CYCLE_IDX);
> > >   set_pmccfiltr(0); /* count cycles in EL0, EL1, but not EL2 */
> > >  
> > > -- 
> > > 2.37.1.559.g78731f0fdb-goog
> > > 
___
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm


Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 2/3] arm: pmu: Reset the pmu registers before starting some tests

2022-08-10 Thread Andrew Jones
On Thu, Aug 04, 2022 at 05:41:38PM -0700, Ricardo Koller wrote:
> Some registers like the PMOVS reset to an architecturally UNKNOWN value.
> Most tests expect them to be reset (mostly zeroed) using pmu_reset().
> Add a pmu_reset() on all the tests that need one.
> 
> As a bonus, fix a couple of comments related to the register state
> before a sub-test.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Eric Auger 
> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Koller 
> ---
>  arm/pmu.c | 6 --
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arm/pmu.c b/arm/pmu.c
> index 4c601b05..12e7d84e 100644
> --- a/arm/pmu.c
> +++ b/arm/pmu.c
> @@ -826,7 +826,7 @@ static void test_overflow_interrupt(void)
>   write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 1, PRE_OVERFLOW);
>   isb();
>  
> - /* interrupts are disabled */
> + /* interrupts are disabled (PMINTENSET_EL1 == 0) */
>  
>   mem_access_loop(addr, 200, pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E);
>   report(expect_interrupts(0), "no overflow interrupt after preset");
> @@ -842,7 +842,7 @@ static void test_overflow_interrupt(void)
>   isb();
>   report(expect_interrupts(0), "no overflow interrupt after counting");
>  
> - /* enable interrupts */
> + /* enable interrupts (PMINTENSET_EL1 <= ALL_SET) */
>  
>   pmu_reset_stats();
>  
> @@ -890,6 +890,7 @@ static bool check_cycles_increase(void)
>   bool success = true;
>  
>   /* init before event access, this test only cares about cycle count */
> + pmu_reset();

This and the other pmu_reset() call below break compilation on 32-bit arm,
because there's no pmu_reset() defined for it. It'd probably be best if
we actually implemented some sort of reset for arm, considering it's being
called in common tests.

Thanks,
drew

>   set_pmcntenset(1 << PMU_CYCLE_IDX);
>   set_pmccfiltr(0); /* count cycles in EL0, EL1, but not EL2 */
>  
> @@ -944,6 +945,7 @@ static bool check_cpi(int cpi)
>   uint32_t pmcr = get_pmcr() | PMU_PMCR_LC | PMU_PMCR_C | PMU_PMCR_E;
>  
>   /* init before event access, this test only cares about cycle count */
> + pmu_reset();
>   set_pmcntenset(1 << PMU_CYCLE_IDX);
>   set_pmccfiltr(0); /* count cycles in EL0, EL1, but not EL2 */
>  
> -- 
> 2.37.1.559.g78731f0fdb-goog
> 
___
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm