Hi,
On 1/13/20 6:21 PM, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 03:54:02PM +0100, Eric Auger wrote:
>> Add helper routines to parse and set up BASER registers.
>> Add a new test dedicated to BASER accesses.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger
>>
>> ---
>>
>> v2 -> v3:
>> - remove everything related to memory attributes
>> - s/dev_baser/coll_baser/ in report_info
>> - add extra line
>> - removed index filed in its_baser
>> ---
>> arm/gic.c| 21 ++-
>> arm/unittests.cfg| 6 +++
>> lib/arm/asm/gic-v3-its.h | 14 +++
>> lib/arm/gic-v3-its.c | 80
>> 4 files changed, 120 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arm/gic.c b/arm/gic.c
>> index adeb981..3597ac3 100644
>> --- a/arm/gic.c
>> +++ b/arm/gic.c
>> @@ -531,11 +531,26 @@ static void test_its_introspection(void)
>> typer->collid_bits);
>> report(typer->eventid_bits && typer->deviceid_bits &&
>> typer->collid_bits, "ID spaces");
>> -report(!typer->hw_collections, "collections only in ext memory");
>> report_info("Target address format %s",
>> typer->pta ? "Redist basse address" : "PE #");
>> }
>>
>> +static void test_its_baser(void)
>> +{
>> +struct its_baser *dev_baser, *coll_baser;
>> +
>> +if (!gicv3_its_base()) {
>> +report_skip("No ITS, skip ...");
>> +return;
>> +}
>> +
>> +dev_baser = its_lookup_baser(GITS_BASER_TYPE_DEVICE);
>> +coll_baser = its_lookup_baser(GITS_BASER_TYPE_COLLECTION);
>> +report(dev_baser && coll_baser, "detect device and collection BASER");
>> +report_info("device baser entry_size = 0x%x", dev_baser->esz);
>> +report_info("collection baser entry_size = 0x%x", coll_baser->esz);
>> +}
>> +
>> int main(int argc, char **argv)
>> {
>> if (!gic_init()) {
>> @@ -571,6 +586,10 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>> report_prefix_push(argv[1]);
>> test_its_introspection();
>> report_prefix_pop();
>> +} else if (strcmp(argv[1], "its-baser") == 0) {
>> +report_prefix_push(argv[1]);
>> +test_its_baser();
>> +report_prefix_pop();
>> } else {
>> report_abort("Unknown subtest '%s'", argv[1]);
>> }
>> diff --git a/arm/unittests.cfg b/arm/unittests.cfg
>> index bd20460..2234a0f 100644
>> --- a/arm/unittests.cfg
>> +++ b/arm/unittests.cfg
>> @@ -128,6 +128,12 @@ smp = $MAX_SMP
>> extra_params = -machine gic-version=3 -append 'its-introspection'
>> groups = its
>>
>> +[its-baser]
>> +file = gic.flat
>> +smp = $MAX_SMP
>> +extra_params = -machine gic-version=3 -append 'its-baser'
>> +groups = its
>
> Do these tests need to be run separately from the its-introspection tests
> for some reason? If not, then I'd combine them.
Not really. To me it is easier to debug and analyze when the fail
though. I will merge both.
Thanks
Eric
>
> Thanks,
> drew
>
___
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
