Hi Christoph,
I'll try to address all of your questions. I discuss some more issues in my
reply to your old email on the topic.
Correct me if I’m wrong but it seems to me that a good representation of
> the spatial part would be rational matrices like the ones returned by
>
>
Hi Christoph,
Here are my comments to your old email.
I see what you mean: calculations are done with matrices that only have the
> translational symmetries left. So what’s the point in solvers knowing
> anything about non-translational symmetries?
First of all, it makes sense to define a
Hi Everyone,
After long discussions with Joe and Michael I got a way better idea about
what the low level system is, and how it's supposed to work. My first
reaction was, the level of abstraction we want to maintain, such as not
storing any of the spatial structure of the system, will make
Hi Kwant people!
I recently joined the Quantum Tinkerer group in Delft, and I'd like to
start a discussion about implementing space-group symmetries in kwant. Find
my initial thoughts below.
Best,
Daniel
I think we can be very general, and treat all kinds of on-site, spatial and
mixed
