Hi Everyone,
After long discussions with Joe and Michael I got a way better idea about
what the low level system is, and how it's supposed to work. My first
reaction was, the level of abstraction we want to maintain, such as not
storing any of the spatial structure of the system, will make
Thanks, Anton and Dániel, for your insightful postings.
I think that, ultimately, there is not so much difference between
the reduced and expanded approaches. The work that needs to be
done to expand the reduced system is equivalent to the work to
check that the expanded system indeed obeys
Dániel Varjas wrote:
(...)
Considering all these complications, I'm not sure that storing
hoppings in the way you propose is feasible. As I understand,
you would specify the sites for the hopping by saying it
connects site i in the fundamental domain to site j in the image
of the
Hi Christoph,
Here are my comments to your old email.
I see what you mean: calculations are done with matrices that only have the
> translational symmetries left. So what’s the point in solvers knowing
> anything about non-translational symmetries?
First of all, it makes sense to define a
Hi,
a short reply to Cristophs answer and a few further comments and questions
Christoph Groth wrote:
> Hi Lars,
>
> Thanks a lot for your comments! I’m doing fine now, but I was ill on
> Friday, hence the latish reply.
>
> I put the others in CC as they might want to comment as well. (I left
