the syntax has changed since you used
> set_symmetry before?
>
> Best,
> Camilla
>
> Fra: Anton Akhmerov <anton.akhme...@gmail.com>
> Sendt: 14. februar 2017 09:48
> Til: Camilla Espedal
> Kopi: kwant-discuss@kwant-projec
ase double-check the remaining simulation parameters.
>
> Anton
>
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Camilla Espedal
> <camilla.espe...@ntnu.no> wrote:
>
> Dear Anton,
>
>
>
> I triend changing it, but that does not solve the problem.
>
>
>
> Best,
>
&
milla.espe...@ntnu.no>
Cc: kwant-discuss@kwant-project.org
Subject: Re: [Kwant] Regarding smatrix and spin
Dear Camilla,
Could the difference originate from you using a lattice constant of 2
instead of 1?
Anton
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017, 10:41 Camilla Espedal <camilla.espe...@ntnu.no>
ax.set_xlabel('$E/t$', fontsize='xx-large')
> ax.legend(fontsize='x-large')
>
> plt.show()
>
>
>
> # Call the main function if the script gets executed (as opposed to
> imported).
> # See <http://docs.python.org/library/__main__.html>.
> if __name__ ==
milla
>
> -Original Message-
> From: anton.akhme...@gmail.com [mailto:anton.akhme...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
> Anton Akhmerov
> Sent: 8. januar 2017 16:35
> To: Tómas Örn Rosdahl <torosd...@gmail.com>
> Cc: Camilla Espedal <camilla.espe...@ntnu.no>; kwant-discus
Hi Camilla, everyone,
I've slightly modified Tómas's example to a case where the spins do
get coupled, check it out:
http://nbviewer.jupyter.org/url/antonakhmerov.org/misc/spin_conductance.ipynb
I've also provided more detailed installation instructions in the notebook.
Cheers,
Anton
On Sun,
Dear Camilla,
For a Hamiltonian with degeneracies due to a conservation law, the
scattering states will in general not have a definite value of the
conservation law. In your case, Kwant returns scattering states that are
arbitrary linear combinations of spin up and down, so it is not possible to
