[libreoffice-l10n] Removing older versions of strings from pootle

2011-04-17 Thread Hossein Noorikhah
Hi, As older versions like LibO 3.3.x are no longer used in pootle for translation, I suggest removing all of them from pootle, so we will have a single version of strings available on pootle. Each package should be upgraded before removing the older version. For example, we still have the old

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Removing older versions of strings from pootle

2011-04-17 Thread Andras Timar
2011/4/17 Hossein Noorikhah hossein...@gmail.com: As older versions like LibO 3.3.x are no longer used in pootle for translation, I suggest removing all of them from pootle, so we will have a single version of strings available on pootle. Each package should be upgraded before removing the

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Removing older versions of strings from pootle

2011-04-17 Thread André Schnabel
Hi, Am 17.04.2011 20:59, schrieb Andras Timar: I also suggest removing version number from the name of the projects, because it has several benefits. One of them is preserving contribution statistics of the project. That's a good point. Statistics are important. I wonder what others think.