Re: [libreoffice-l10n] [ANNOUNCE] Locale data date acceptance patterns, localizers HEADS UP please :)

2012-01-18 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Jean-Baptiste, On Sunday, 2012-01-15 07:34:09 +0100, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote: I think for fr_FR we need D/M. Asked for other FR variants on discuss@fr ML. Any news on that? If not, I'll just add D/M Eike -- LibreOffice Calc developer. Number formatter stricken i18n

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] [ANNOUNCE] Locale data date acceptance patterns, localizers HEADS UP please :)

2012-01-18 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Yury, On Wednesday, 2012-01-18 09:24:42 +0200, Yury Tarasievich wrote: Of course, if the functionality is there, anyway, and has to be fed something, even such not-quite-intuitive forms will do. It doesn't _have_ to be fed something, without a specific pattern only input of a full date

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] [ANNOUNCE] Locale data date acceptance patterns, localizers HEADS UP please :)

2012-01-18 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Niklas, On Tuesday, 2012-01-17 11:09:57 +0100, Niklas Johansson wrote: [... time separator ...] Is it possible to accept both . and : as separators? No, only one is possible. Common dateformats that LibreOffice doesn't support for Swedish include: D/M D/M EU-standard (not seen

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] [ANNOUNCE] Locale data date acceptance patterns, localizers HEADS UP please :)

2012-01-18 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Aferkiw, On Wednesday, 2012-01-18 00:05:58 +0100, Aferkiw N Tamazgha wrote: I don't understand ... What I need to change for kab_DZ kab-DZ uses DD/MM/ as edit date format, so D/M/Y is generated as date acceptance pattern. If additionally the input of incomplete dates, consisting

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] [ANNOUNCE] Locale data date acceptance patterns, localizers HEADS UP please :)

2012-01-18 Thread Yury Tarasievich
On 01/18/2012 03:50 PM, Eike Rathke wrote: ... But it would be ever so better to have a possibility for computer to not second-guess at all, as such guesses might even be culturally irrelevant. ... I'm confused now, does be-BY want incomplete date patterns, yes or no? Yes. Sorry. And also

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] [ANNOUNCE] Locale data date acceptance patterns, localizers HEADS UP please :)

2012-01-18 Thread Cheng-Chia Tseng
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:05 AM, Eike Rathke er...@redhat.com wrote: Hi Cheng-Chia, On Tuesday, 2012-01-17 12:22:17 +0800, Cheng-Chia Tseng wrote: For zh-TW, full date patterns are: Y-M-D Y/M/D Y.M.D Y-M-D is the always accepted ISO 8601 pattern, and Y/M/D is already generated from

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] [ANNOUNCE] Locale data date acceptance patterns, localizers HEADS UP please :)

2012-01-18 Thread Niklas Johansson
Hi Eike [... time separator ...] Is it possible to accept both . and : as separators? No, only one is possible. OK, good to know. EU-standard (not seen that often but since were in the EU and all EU documents , use this format it would be a good thing to support): D.M D.M. Which