Re: [libreoffice-l10n] is a valid xml tag?

2016-08-01 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi *, On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote: > in the string jKbn9 in > https://translations.documentfoundation.org/fr/libo_help/translate/scalc/guide.po#unit=108741441 > there is a tag , if I keep this tag Pootle detects > a "valid xml" error and

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] a bug with lang-packs on osx?

2016-08-01 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi *, On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Kruno wrote: > 30.07.2016 u 09:53, Martin Srebotnjak je napisao/la: >> >> Hi, >> >> could l10n teams try to confirm my bug report: >> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101210 >> >> The rc4 install sets for OSX are here:

[libreoffice-l10n] Re: a bug with lang-packs on osx?

2016-08-01 Thread Thomas Hackert
Hello Kruno, *, Kruno wrote: >> Think I saw it one of LO's release notes. you were right here ... ;) From https://www.libreoffice.org/download/release-notes/ Mac OS X: Please start LibreOffice at least once before installing a LanguagePack. HTH Thomas. -- Sometimes I simply feel that the

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] a bug with lang-packs on osx?

2016-08-01 Thread Martin Srebotnjak
No, Kruno, this is a new issue, I know, I reported the other one ... This bug is about no being able to install a langpack on OSX at all and if confirmed it should be a stopper for 5.2. Lp, m. 30. jul. 2016 10.14 je oseba "Kruno" napisala: > 30.07.2016 u 09:53, Martin