[libreoffice-l10n] Re: l10n process, en_US version, Help files

2013-12-18 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 17:19 +0100, Sophie wrote: Hi all, This mail is posted to the dev list and the l10n list, please follow up on the l10n list. I would like to open a discussion on the l10n workflow, the quality of the en_US version and the Help files. All is linked and I would like to

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: l10n process, en_US version, Help files

2013-12-12 Thread Andras Timar
On 2013.12.12. 0:35, Robinson Tryon wrote: On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Sophie gautier.sop...@gmail.com wrote: *After RC1 and l10n integration - we need to know when integration is made after our fixes, there is currently no communication on this Perhaps documenting the process in

[libreoffice-l10n] Re: l10n process, en_US version, Help files

2013-12-12 Thread Sophie
Hi Andras, all, Le 12/12/2013 11:18, Andras Timar a écrit : On 2013.12.11. 17:19, Sophie wrote: *About the en_US overall quality - the process to rely on the l10n team to fix the en_US version is ok, even if it gives us extra work to understand what is meant before we realized it's a mistake.

[libreoffice-l10n] Re: l10n process, en_US version, Help files

2013-12-12 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Sophie, *, On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Sophie gautier.sop...@gmail.com wrote: [...] *Before updating Pootle: - it's important for l10n team to know the approx load of work that will be needed to achieve the whole work. Time between beta1 and rc1 is short and that will help to better

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: l10n process, en_US version, Help files

2013-12-12 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi *, On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 7:29 PM, Sophie gautier.sop...@gmail.com wrote: Le 11/12/2013 19:24, Thomas Hackert a écrit : [...] would this discussion not more suitable after the 4.2 release ;? Only answering your question: nope, because 4.3 is already on the radar, so that would be great

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: l10n process, en_US version, Help files

2013-12-12 Thread Andras Timar
Hi Christian, On 2013.12.12. 13:56, Christian Lohmaier wrote: Yes, 4.2.0 was the first time I did update the projects in pootle, and I personally think it was not a huge desaster. There were two stumbling stones: 1) update_against_templates aborting because of added/renamed files 2) lots of

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: l10n process, en_US version, Help files

2013-12-12 Thread Sophie
Hi Christian, Le 12/12/2013 13:56, Christian Lohmaier a écrit : Hi Sophie, *, On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Sophie gautier.sop...@gmail.com wrote: [...] *Before updating Pootle: - it's important for l10n team to know the approx load of work that will be needed to achieve the whole work.

[libreoffice-l10n] Re: l10n process, en_US version, Help files

2013-12-11 Thread Thomas Hackert
Hello Sophie, *, On Mittwoch, 11. Dezember 2013 17:19 Sophie wrote: snip I would like to open a discussion on the l10n workflow, the quality of the en_US version and the Help files. All is linked and I would like to discuss how we can improve the process here. I'm sure that having a better

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: l10n process, en_US version, Help files

2013-12-11 Thread Sophie
Le 11/12/2013 19:24, Thomas Hackert a écrit : Hello Sophie, *, On Mittwoch, 11. Dezember 2013 17:19 Sophie wrote: snip I would like to open a discussion on the l10n workflow, the quality of the en_US version and the Help files. All is linked and I would like to discuss how we can improve the

[libreoffice-l10n] Re: l10n process, en_US version, Help files

2013-12-11 Thread Robinson Tryon
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Sophie gautier.sop...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, This mail is posted to the dev list and the l10n list, please follow up on the l10n list. I would like to open a discussion on the l10n workflow, the quality of the en_US version and the Help files. All is