On Tuesday 9. January 2018 00.46.53 Adam Lackorzynski wrote:
> On Mon Jan 08, 2018 at 01:14:09 +0100, Paul Boddie wrote:
> >
> > I'm aiming to follow up with the binutils maintainers about this, but I
> > just wondered if any of this sounded problematic or familiar.
>
> No, not familiar. It
On Mon Jan 08, 2018 at 01:14:09 +0100, Paul Boddie wrote:
> On Monday 8. January 2018 00.37.41 Adam Lackorzynski wrote:
> >
> > Is it ok if you have visibility("hidden") instead of internal?
>
> No, it would seem that all other visibility types produce the same error. In
> fact, the only thing
Hi,
after the dust around the Meltdown and Spectre attacks has settled a bit, you
may wonder how Fiasco.OC / L4Re fares with regard to these attacks.
Fiasco.OC / L4Re is vulnerable to Meltdown-like attacks because the kernel is
mapped into each task. However, the kernel does not map all physical
